The curvature ductility factors were typically larger than the displacement ductility factors. The curvature ductility factor of specimen SCG1 was 15% higher than the ductility factor of specimen SCC1. The curvature ductility factor of specimen SCG3 was 22% higher than the ductility factor of specimen SCC3. Therefore an improvement in the curvature ductility factor was observed for the specimens reinforced with the CFRP grid. Table 6-6. Experimental curvature ductility factors Specimen Mi Mu ,o ,u [o (k-ft) (k-ft) (rad/in.) (rad/in.) SCC1 89.8 89.8 0.000708 0.000789 1.10 SCC2 114.5 114.5 0.000714 0.000810 1.13 SCC3 102.7 104.3 0.000683 0.000778 1.10 SCG1 112.3 121.1 0.000721 0.000912 1.26 SCG3 107.2 116.1 0.000566 0.000759 1.34 Conclusions Based on the results presented in this chapter the following conclusions can be drawn: * The results from the piles indicate that the ductility of the grid piles was improved by and amount of approximately 12 to 22% depending on the type of ductility factor used. The visual observations during the testing of specimen SCG2 point towards an even greater improvement for that specimen. Experimental data to support these visual observations do not exist because they were lost during the test. * The fiber model calculated the capacity of the piles. The difference between the experimental and predicted peak loads was less than 8%. * The tests revealed problems with the manufacturing practice that proved to be very significant in influencing the behavior of the pile specimens. * The results presented in this chapter represent a lower bound solution to the ductility problem of spun-cast manufactured CFRP reinforced piles. Based on the test observations and data presented in this chapter the following comments and recommendations are offered: * Concrete confinement can be further improved with the use of a heavier grid with more fibers in the hoop direction or more layers of this particular grid. It is therefore recommended to use a higher number of grid layers of a heavier grid.