CHAPTER 4 RESULTS Chapter 1 provided the introduction of Kirton's Adaption-Innovation (A-I) theory as it applies to learning styles of undergraduate students in the classroom. Attention was also given to Kirton's separation of cognitive level from cognitive style. The chapter also presented a need for facilitating student engagement in the undergraduate classroom. A dissimilar learning style (cognitive gap) between the university faculty member and the student may give insight to why students are not engaged. The purpose of this study was to determine if significant relationships exist between cognitive style gap, student stress, student motivation, student engagement and selected student demographic variables of undergraduate students at the University of Florida in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. The specific objectives of this study were to: 1) describe selected faculty and students according to their selected demographic variables; 2) determine the cognitive style, student stress, student motivation, and student engagement of undergraduate students; 3) determine the cognitive style gap between faculty and students and to explore its relationship with student stress, student motivation, student engagement and specific demographic variables of undergraduate students; 4) explain undergraduate student stress and student motivation based on cognitive style gap and selected demographic variables; and 5) explain undergraduate student engagement based on cognitive style gap, student stress, student motivation and selected demographic variables. Furthermore, chapter 1 listed definitions, basic assumptions, and cited limitations of the study.