LIST OF TABLES Table page 3-1 Cronbach's alpha and item total correlation values for measured indices............62 4-1 Descriptive data summary for Cherokee TAP user groups created from the behavior index measuring use of traditional agricultural practices, Cherokee N ation, O klahom a, 2005. ............................................................. 69 4-2 Values of U, Z, and p Mann-Whitney U test for behavior index based on high and low TAP user groups (a = 0.05),Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma, 2005 .............70 4-3 Interview responses of high and low TAP user groups for questions measuring use of traditional agricultural practices, Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma, 2005..........71 4-4 Values of U, Z, and p in Mann-Whitney U test for socioeconomic characteristic based on high and low TAP user groups (a = 0.05), Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma, 2005 ....................................................73 4-5 Contingency Table and Fisher's exact test for gender based on high and low TAP user groups (a = 0.05), Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma, 2005 ........................74 4-6 Contingency Table and Fisher's Exact Test for selling crops based on high and low TAP user groups (a = 0.05), Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma, 2005 .................74 4-7 Values of U, Z, and p in Mann-Whitney U test for theory of planned behavior variables based on high and low TAP user groups (a = 0.05), Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma, 2005 ....................................................78 4-8 Interview responses of high and low TAP user groups for questions measuring attitudes towards traditional agriculture, Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma, 2005........79 4- 9 Interview responses of high and low TAP user groups for question measuring traditional control beliefs, Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma, 2005.............................82 4-10 Interview responses of high and low TAP user groups for question measuring subjective norms, Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma, 2005................. ........ ........ 84 4-11 Interview responses of high and low TAP user groups for question measuring normative beliefs, Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma, 2005. ........................................85