sense that couples who were less satisfied with their household/family and child-related role arrangements would also be couples who had less agreement about their typical style of resolving conflicts. Partners who do not have an accurate sense of how they approach conflicts together, or who have differing preferences for how to approach conflict, are likely to be less effective at producing satisfying outcomes from their negotiations, including the negotiation of satisfying role arrangements. However, the role dissatisfaction measure only explained 4.8% of the variance in the couple conflict type discrepancy scores. It appears factors not included in this investigation are more strongly related to this discrepancy. Gottman (1994) found couple conflict type "mismatches" to be highly predictive of negative marital outcomes, such as dissatisfaction and destructive conflict patterns. He hypothesized that the hostile couple conflict type may represent a couple's inability to agree on one of the three regulated conflict types due to differing preferences. It is therefore somewhat surprising that the couple conflict type discrepancy score calculated for this investigation was not significantly associated with most of the study's variables. However, the participants in this study were asked to rate how frequently their conflicts matched those described in a depiction of each of the couple conflict types, not how they would prefer their conflict interactions to be. Discrepancies were therefore based on differences in partners' perceptions of their conflict interactions rather than differences in their preferences. Future research assessing partners' preferences regarding the couple conflict types in addition to their typical conflict interaction styles may be of more value. Associations between Couple Conflict Types and the Couple-Level Variables A canonical correlation procedure was conducted to test the relationships between the couple conflict types (volatile, conflict-avoiding, validating, and hostile) and the