with theorists and researchers advocating for a more constructivist narrative rather than a

reductionist approach to career exploration (Manuele-Adkins, 1992; Kidd, 1998;

Wonacott, 2001; Savickas, 1993). In addition, both the quantitative outcomes and the

evaluation results suggested that the combination of traditional and narrative exercises

can be helpful for those who are exploring careers in the new world of work (Savickas,

1992). In fact, of the three most popular exercises (as reported by participants in the final

evaluation), one would be considered traditional and two new, postmodern approaches.

 It is clear that the intervention was helpful in increasing participants' career

certainty while decreasing their career indecision. The fact that participants with the best

scores (high certainty and low indecision) were four times more likely to have done the

intervention than not was an important indicator of the potential impact of this type of

intervention.

 By asking participants to expand exploration of career interest, skills, personality,

and values into the realms of spirituality, purpose, meaning, and mission, this online tool

brought a new dimension to online career development tools. While not all of the

participants reported that the website was very helpful in terms of their career

development, most of them indicated that they would recommend the site to a friend.

This may indicate some confusion on the part of the participants in that they were not

sure about the concept of career development but liked and would recommend the site as

a whole.

 At the same time, the number of participants in the experimental groups who

abandoned the project without finishing was troublesome. The length of the project and

the amount of writing involved may have deterred people from finishing. Further

research is needed to determine if pairing the online tool with individual or group