Table 4-7. Continued.
Plot NBP AvgBT AvgD (mm) Ma2xD (mm) M 2inD (mm) AvgWg (g) NA (Fruits/plot)
119 6.3 3.2 66.1 73.8 60.0 157.0 819.1
126 4.6 2.3 69.4 76.9 63.5 182.6 514.3
127 7.6 3.8 71.0 79.3 64.6 193.5 801.5
128 7.2 3.6 70.5 79.4 63.6 195.1 753.2
80 9.4 4.7 66.0 76.1 58.9 154.9 1238.9
82 7.2 3.6 67.8 76.8 60.7 166.3 883.6
83 7.6 3.8 70.5 78.4 64.4 188.7 822.3
84 8.1 4.1 68.5 78.7 61.8 160.4 1030.6
90 5.9 3.0 70.4 77.2 64.9 188.8 638.0
91 9.0 4.5 70.3 77.0 64.8 191.5 959.2
92 6.3 3.2 74.8 81.7 69.1 233.8 550.0
98 6.8 3.4 71.0 77.5 65.8 190.1 730.2
99 6.3 3.2 69.7 76.8 64.0 182.8 703.5
100 4.1 2.1 77.1 82.7 72.3 245.2 341.3
101 7.6 3.8 72.1 79.3 66.3 198.4 782.1
102 6.8 3.4 68.6 76.9 62.6 172.0 807.1
104 6.8 3.4 75.2 81.9 69.9 227.4 610.3
117 9.0 4.5 68.1 76.5 62.4 170.6 1076.9
118 9.4 4.7 66.5 75.0 60.3 156.9 1222.5



 There were cases in which images of entire plot was not taken. For example,

images were taken only on west side of plots 82 and 83 since there were moisture sensors

(tensiometers) installed on the other side of the plot. Also on plot 43, due to the

operator' s mistake, images were taken only for one tree on one side while images were

taken for both trees on the other side. Hence, these three plots 82, 83, and 43 were

removed from the data analysis. Regression analysis was carried out between NA and the

number of fruits/plot predicted by the fruit counting algorithm. It was found out that there

was an outlier for plot 7 and subsequently it was removed from further data analysis.

Fruit/plot were predicted based on three models using the following three variables:

NPfrivts, NPplxels and NPfivats-plxels.

 Fruits/plot data for the remaining 44 plots was sorted in ascending order based on

these three variables. For each model, alternate plots were chosen and combined into two