comparable to residues bl-34, which contains the membrane-spanning domain, dissolved in a 4:4: 1 v/v mixture of chloroform/methanol/water previously used for solving the structure of subunit c, has been solved by NMR (136). The data revealed an a-helical monomeric structure with a 20o bend at residues 23-26 (KYVW) (Figure 1-5). The hydrophobic residues, b4-22, formed an a-helix, followed by the 200 bend, and then resumed with a-helical structure from residues b27-34. The bend was proposed to be positioned as the b subunit exits the membrane. A series of cysteine substitutions resulted in a high yield of crosslinks formed at residues b2, b6, and blo (Figure 1-5). A lower yield of crosslinks were observed to form at residues b3, bs, b9 and bll (Figure 1-5). No crosslinks were observed when cysteines were substituted for residues 12-21. The observance of continuous crosslinks between residues b6-11 WeTO Suggested to indicate a dynamic interaction between the contacting faces of the two b subunits in this region (132). These observations led to a dimeric model in which the extreme amino-termini of the b subunits crossed each other in close proximity at an angle of about 350 in the region of residues b4-11, and then the two b subunits angled apart as they traverse the membrane towards the cytoplasmic side (Figure 1-5) (136). The region of the 200 bend, b23-26, WAS suggested to change the direction of the second a-helix, b27-33, Such that it would extend into the cytoplasm at an angle perpendicular to the plan of the membrane. This model was confirmed by a systematic mutational analysis of the membrane-spanning domain performed by Hardy et al. (202). The tether domain of the b subunit, roughly b24-60, iS the least defined part of the subunit domains from a structural point of view. It corresponds to the portion of the peripheral stalk often seen in electron micrographs and is called "tether" simply because