Detailed Plan Description I -r , . - ..- - I ', - ir i i ,;. . , ,r-... ,. h . - r r. [, n r .h . ! - r.. i)- ..-- -I rh rh ,_ , , - ,. -r h ! r. rhI. ., rh -.. . .. r ,t r. "-1 i | ' ' . .....I n- - r - h , - iri . * - - I - - h ill ,.P! !,! , -- ... h r..- .. - - .- I n- - ,- II - .- - - - ,1. . ,.I,- ,,,.I !,! i . - I _. :..r , rh ,_ ' |-'| .-'r..' . . *..-_- l,.I rh i.- W I, r. ! - i l I . :..n .. ,_r. as a whole is the stated primary objective. This concept proposes that the two primary and two secondary riparian corridors of the town (illustrated previously in the hydrology plan), be brought into a voluntary conservation/green way system. This process would have to be a joint effort between the town and the current property owners. The town's responsibility would be locating, purchasing and maintaining the vacant parcels within the newly created conservation zones, while the current property owners would have to subscribe to a voluntary set of guidelines to protect their lands. These purchased lands could serve a variety of uses and could have designated JM , -I r, , I ,,_ . ,_n.. | -[ .I ,_-1, - T ,_..1.| . ,_._' - ,r,_ " *....r ,i , .,tr i, ici Wi -. Cr. in, , '' I 1 44 1. - i l ip I 'r. ---irh ...i. r ._ . i.- . -I r . . 11 , , i- - - - I ..,. I - .. rh -r .. Ii ri . it-. . .; ; .i 1. . 11-n n. i r . 1 I in 1. .-. .-.. r l. . .--- . .u l hl ',. ,n' r,, pT ' ,r.._, r , ,. l r .I,. - , . I. T n , "r I i , -)..I , . ,. I W - ,!, ._ . ; ,ll . . - , ! ,i.. I, I ri.l " ! l . ! - ,_ - r , " i , ! i , i - *- ! * h , i * | . . , .I On the pnvate land owners' end, the obligation could only be a voluntary act of the individual, due mainly to the current desires of the town's residents not to be "government controlled". The affected landowners could be informed about the necessary steps needed to be taken to conserve the special qualities of their land and at the same time educated on possible ways to enhance and protect the value of their property. Some suggestion given to the property owners could be ideas on water conservation, minimal use of fertilizers, creating landscape plantings that promote wildlife and ways to limit impermeable surfaces on their property. This master plan proposes two large parcels, very different in their appearances, to be used for recreational activities. One . .t rh ,_. . . ' ,;, ! - - . .,; ,r . l.I 1- rh . .. -, , .'r h - - r . i i ...l , r ..- 1 i-i , .l rt-i .. .. r t - 1 r. .. 1 1 _ ,- ,*r h --_ .-r ! ',;,_ . I ,iii-1 H i t ---irh I ' , .. .. l... I . . r -. . i n . - h ! -.. . -r . n- nI i - -' r . r.- . It!..1 l ..:r .. - .)h rh. S I . p , n, 'r il n t ,h . r _ t . -- .. n .:.tr... highest in the town. A site such as this one, with dramatic topography, calls for a higher level of activity and movement to enable us- ers to access the awesome view. The site also has many areas with major slopes that will contribute to the appeal of active recreation, such as hiking and/or mountain biking. This area will be buffered by open space to lend views from off the property. It will also connect to a small park maintained by the town and tie into the southernmost finger of the proposed green way system. The rail-trail proposed will form a linear recreational corridor that connects not only all four branches of the green way system but also the new commercial area proposed around the old depot as well as the historic district to other neighboring communities. SIclntosh, Fl: A Study On The Preservation Of Genius Loci