- 4 - 12. We now turn to the actual evidence. Construction on the pontoon bridge according to thb evidence started on or about the 16th or 17th of May, 1962, and as early as the 17th of May Mr. Milan saw some young boys swimming in the river and climbing on to the barges and this disturbed his workmen. A day or two after he saw two ladies using the pontoon bridge to cross the river and walking on the 2 x 12 planks between the two barges. He spoke to them and told them it was dangerous. Later that day he complained to Mr. Cattouso, the Minister of Public Works, Power and Communications and i~r. Gill, Principal Secretary to the Ministry. ,,s a result Mr. Cattouse and Mr. Gill in the company of Inspector Brown and Commiasioner of Police Taylor visited the site. They agreed that thispractice was dangerous and the Police decided to put a constable on duty to stop the pedestrian crossing. After a constable was posted at the pontoon bridge the number of people using the bridge to cross diminished, but many still continued to use it and argued with the Police when he tried to- stop them. 13. A barricade made out of 2 x 4 timbers fixed at a height of four feet from the ground was placed at the entrance of the ramp on the Pickstock Street side. People were still able to pass under this barricade or around the end of it, and in fact, did so. On the night of the 29th or 30th May, Milan's watchman reported that some men broke down the barricade and threw the lumber into the river. This was reported by Milan's workmen to Assistant Superintendent of Police Fuller who suggested that it be reported to the Police Department. The following day Mr. Milan reported it to Mr. Cattouse and Mr. Gill and it appears that Mr. Cattouse and Mr. Gill in company of the Police again visited the site, While there, they discussed the problem of people crossing and many other matters concerning the bridge such as, handrails, traffic movements and signal lights. Apparently, there were no written notices or signs advising people .. that the