BULLETIN NO. 68 unconfined FAS; see Plates 29 and 30). In contrast, these same deposits may locally exceed 100 ft (30.5 m) thick where they infill karst features (including paleo-sinks represented by W-15075 and W-10829; Plates 5, 6 and 29). Depending on the permeability of infilling sediments, the karst features may provide hydraulic connection between the SAS and the FAS. Topographic inversion (i.e., differential carbonate dissolution due to chemical buffering and confinement) also contributes to the highly variable thickness of the SAS in the northern region. Along the axis of the Brooksville Ridge, for example, more than 50 ft (15.2 m) of SAS is locally observed. Much of the Ridge, however, is perforated by sinkholes (Plate 3), making delineation of the SAS problematic. Although lithologic data from wells support presence of the SAS along the Brooksville Ridge, extent of the unit is even more subjective in the surrounding region. Assessment of regional mapping (geology [Figure 2], environmental geology [Figure 4], and soil permeability [Figure 18]) warrants the dashed (i.e., approximate) extent of the SAS in the region (Plate 55). These hachured areas are considered semi- confined to unconfined FAS. In addition to lithologic evidence, hydraulic data support local delineation of the SAS in parts of the northern region. Well W-15647 (ROMP 90; Plate 10) provides a classic example of confinement between the SAS and the FAS in this region. Water levels measured during drilling rose 3 ft (0.9 m) when the clays underlying the SAS were fully penetrated and artesian conditions of the FAS became evident. The IAS/ICU in this well is too thin to depict graphically in Plate 10. Moreover, given the proximity of the well to the IAS/ICU extent, whether the clays are basal SAS or IAS/ICU is subjective. Confined and semi-confined areas of Citrus County have been identified (Lee, 1998). Water levels in paired monitor wells also provide valuable information regarding the presence of the SAS (i.e., basal confinement) in the absence of an extensive IAS/ICU. This data, however, should be interpreted with caution: similar water levels may reflect "leaky" confinement and seasonal or local pumping conditions should be considered. The "Floridan" water levels in W-14336 (ROMP 93, Plate 10), are at least 5 ft (1.5 m) lower than SAS water levels (U.S. Geological Survey, 1990) indicating a well-defined hydraulic separation between the two aquifer systems. Hydrologic data from W- 16644 (ROMP LP-6), located approximately 2 mi (3.2 km) north of cross section D-D' (Plate 7) indicates that FAS water levels are typically more than one foot (0.3 m) above the surficial water table. At W-16644, 12 ft (3.7 m) of clay and clayey sand provide sufficient confinement between the FAS and SAS. As noted above, effectiveness of the hydraulic separation between the SAS and the subjacent FAS varies locally. Water levels in the paired wells L11KD and L11KS (northeast of W-5054, Plate 2), are nearly indistinguishable, thus indicating leaky to unconfined conditions between the FAS and "water table" levels in surficial sediments (U.S. Geological Survey, 1998). In contrast, water levels from the monitor-well pair L11MM and LI MS (southeast of W-5054, Plate 2) confirm existence of SAS conditions because "water- table" elevations differ from the FAS potentiometric surface (U.S. Geological Survey, 1998). Paired monitor wells with inconsistent trends in water levels suggest that there may be some degree of confinement of the FAS, either as low permeability horizons in the base of the SAS or in the uppermost carbonates of the FAS (e.g., mudstones/micrites or densely recrystallized zones). A SWFWMD Technical Memorandum (Basso, 2004) provides detail on the hydrogeologic setting of the Hemando-Pasco County (or "Northern Tampa Bay") region. In the memorandum, the location of wetlands, soil properties, lithologic data and hydrographs from nested wells and lakes are used to delineate three zones: unconfined UFA, locally perched water table (generally restricted to the southern