WILLIAMS: CHASMODES TAXONOMY


Table 7-Matrix of covariance comparisons of maxillary length regression equations (Table
 5) for populations of Chasmodes bosquianus bosquianus and C. b. longimaxilla
 (P<0.001). 0 = coincident lines; = noncoincident but parallel lines; + = non-
 coincident and nonparallel lines. (Population abbreviations defined in Table 3.)
 BM BF BS BN BC LS LM LA LL
 BM 0 0 0 0
 BF 0 0 0
 BS 0 0
 BN 0
 BC + -
 LS 0 0
 LM 0 0
 LA 0
 LL


 SCALE
0 250 500KM


94" 90* 86*


4~
4i


 /



a


;iy


82 78' 74"


FIGURE 5.-Distributional records for species and subspecies of Chasmodes. Grand Terre,
Louisiana, record based on University of Southwestern Louisiana specimen (cat. no. 3496) not
included in material examined.
teeth.
 Comparisons of regression equations for maxillary length (Table 5)
show no statistically significant differences between populations of C. b.
bosquianus (Table 7). Significant differences were found for comparisons


SC.B. BOSQUIANUS
* C.B. LONGIMAXILLA
* C. SABURRAE
* AREAS WHERE BOTH C. SABURRAE AND
 C. B. LONGIMAXILLA HAVE BEEN COLLECTED
o SPECIMENS OF C.B. LONGIMAXILLA
 REPORTED BY BATH (1977)


20"


' ' '





 L


 ir
 9'
I





'a


^-^