304 7.4.2 Correlation of Resilient Moduli with Cone Resistance The average qc values determined from each layer were compared to the respective NDT tuned layer moduli. The results of these comparisons are illustrated in Tables 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4, for the base course, sub base, and subgrade layers, respectively. The ratios of tuned moduli to cone resistance presented in Tables 7.2 to 7.4 indicate that variability increases from E2 through Eg to E^. However, significantly high ratios were obtained for the base course and subbase layers for some of the pavements. For example, the SR 12 pavement had a ratio of 61.29 using the Dynaflect tuned E2 (Table 7.2). The corresponding FWD E2 to qc ratio, 15.83, does not differ much from the others in the FWD column. Also, the plate loading test results gave an E2 value of 43,000 psi (see Table 6.17) as compared to the NDT tuned values of 120,000 and 31,000 psi, respectively, with the Dynaflect and FWD deflection responses. Thus, the FWD prediction of the base course modulus on SR 12 test section may be more realistic than that of the Dynaflect. Pavement sections and layers having extremely high or low ratios were excluded in subsequent analysis of the data. Regression analyses were performed between resilient (or tuned NDT) moduli and cone resistance. The results are summarized in Table 7.5. The results suggest that the correlations are good for the base and subbase layers but poor for the subgrade. Also, the results for the combined data are similar to those for the base and subbase layers as compared to the subgrade layer. The poor correlation in the subgrade could be due to the natural variability in the subgrade soils compared to the essentially homogeneous base and subbase materials. The tech nique of determining the subgrade layer might have also affected the