Journal 4,' '..di~uirwa and I ppJfiJ4 d Econlomc,fl. Aix:rfr1 Jro place. The basis *.' the determination of "like product" centers on the economic priisiple that if two or more gtiol are perfectlyv ho- iln(IgciicuiLi' then all ,* lheir prices must move together h ritcll) If a market consists of' "like god,." the prices of these rooJd. would also move ir~gihei. although not per- Il c [ If the prices ol gu .od, in a market move independent I. then the ioodsI. cannot he "like goods." Jordan and VanSicklc (I''15..i used this ap- proach to determine whether FlhnriLi and Mex- ican fresh tomatoes were integrated in the same market. Thc, concluded Ilr'i their study that Florida and Mexico were in fact intelgt-l- ed in the same market. Mexico was primarily a shipper of vine-ripened tomatoes and Florida was priin.irily a shipper of mature ngrLenI to- matoes. Within the context of trade Llipue.. the conclusion reached by the authors ueg- ec'-ted that the two producIt could be consid- ered as "like prtodilt." The ,.pcL lil u.1,n used by Jordan and VanSickle ( 995.1 to determine whether two commodities, a and b, could be al.litineul as "like products" in the same market was (1) P. = + p, + . ; + 2" V + e, 61. + p, where P .in- I (: represent the price and quan- tity of L.IIII.mIm1dJi\ a in time period and like- wise P/ and Q represent the price and quan- tity I' ~m.illiiin .lu4 b in time period t. I'h Iclnglh of the lags used in the .inial\.i (as- sumed here to be / prii r0. can be determined Lhrou Lh a series of statistical tests. The distur- bances ,' the equations arc assumed to have the rlllh int. priq lnic,. * 1 I I l .-[ .0 r[... 1 = 0 for t ~ ., and for i.J 1. 2 Lir-.. 1 = a It is re.iitil seen that the parameters of each equation are irlkittd, I"The above sicin can be estimated by any simultaneous eqila- tions estimator. However. i.elln the cross- equation h.poihii' tests to be examined, thret-l.isc le.i-ia-quare is a convenient esti- mation procedure with Lksrirhlc properties. The ft\ll,_,-inig tests are conducted to deter- mine whether ilhe markets for commodities a and h are inrteLraicJ (the iL.i'iiinioiJiiic are "like pridlut" I or, if not, lich extent to which the markets are separated (market segmenta- ion The null hI.t pthe-i, is that the market is not inti-Ir.ie.i (i.e., it is Lrien teid). iher est the alternative hb p ithic.,' is that it is integrat- 4 1 I , 1 0 t i I , Hence, rejecting the nill hilp.the'.i. in the above test implies that the products are inte- t.ruted in the market and can be considered to be "like products." A more gencrl approach can be specified fI.r an arbitrary number tOf coLnmmndiCtle. In the presence 'I more than two ..uimni tiiie., how- ever, the system is most v.i..ily seen in matrix form. (.i.'i.'r.tnil/iin to In Lomltii illiik. the .elliialiuln, can be written as: (4) YV + -B E. with the IOiull..i iiL te Jdtrllliiiii l ' P11 Y- I 'i ii., PJ P,1r, X=lI P-1 -P Q -QI Q ] Pill P .0 PP2I pitl PIE I P~, .I I iis a Tcricimcni ivlum.n of oneCs I