Vefiu.s Ur. Evany. O)V I meron: I '. -Calladin rf omvo Wars producers frim making these decisions is poorly managed igocrnnmcni programs that mislead producers into making poor produc- tion decisions or poor nilln.uagcinelii on the par of producers who control a significant portion of the inmdui y. These laws allow do- mestic producers to seek relief from these poor decisions. It does not protect producers who are at a competitive disadi ;tanil~ For- eign producers who hold a c niil ;tii\e ad- %;intl.ig in a product will be allowed i, take .addlloniial market share without redress from the antidumping laws. The greenhouse tomatoes from Canada case either was not as coirpltk.tited as the I IC made it when determining ith like product is- sue or was more ..1.lVpJiilled than the DOC made it in determining the subject merchan- dise. The criticism in this invre-tiJgaiun comes by way of the analysis used to judge like prr.l- uct, which ultimately drove the decision on injury. The ITC ucsd anecdotal evidence on physical .har.zcririi~c a;ind uses; interLlh;Inte. ability: channels of diilribulioni. common pro- duction fIl.ilics. processes, and emp. lia.C. and price. [)unng the finid hearing with the ITC, respondents supplied greenhouse-grown tomatoes and high-quaijiy ticld-grown toma- toes as visual evidence that the two were like plrIdLi l% pFrJuclts rield-grown and reclnh,)uLc-gro)n to- nlatoes are ,ilil'if in their outward .ippear- ance. Properly handled hei lii- gro n tomatoes can be \i--tiill .tiir.adiiv. appearing very l ril]ri to prFenhlrMe-er~in tomatoes. In the IWq6 aintidunping petition filed by U.S. ro.'wer ;iegainslnI Mexican Ircsh tomatoes, Metsc.an respondents .rguud that vine-rip- ened tomatoes were ditinctly diftleren1T from mature green tomatoes. Mexico was primar- ily a shipper n' vine-iipened tomatoes, and Florida was primarilI a shipper of mature green tomatoes. The re'spndenit centered their argument on pricing, consumer prefer- ence, and market channels. Evidence provid- ed by respondents in that case indl.icated tha -ine-ripened tomatoes received higher prices than mature erten Cioniatesc. consumers pre- ferred vine-ripenerc tomatoes, and the retail market was controlled more by vine-ripened tmrnatics. whereas the food service sector was controlled more by mature green toma- toes. Pe(ilironIc in that case countered with .iturrnumntl' that (1) outward appearance demonstrates the likeness in product id]s- playing vine-ripened and properly handled mature green tomatoes before the Commis- sioners); (21 there is r.ig.intiL.. overlap in production practices and in markets, with mature green tomatoes .o'npcting vigorous- ly with vine-ripened tomatoes in the reti.l nm.rkctl and (3) lsudic% show no consistent consumer prcfcrencc for one over the other. Pctii4oncr% also provided the study by Jordan and VanSickle ( l1'-9.i thla demonstrated imr.ijkL integration between mature uieen and %inc-ripencd tomatoes (Jordan and VanSickle I '5.,i. ThL arguments in the I.' -Canada case were inmilar. except the petitioners were trying to limit the scope of the like product to a nar- rower deftirliolln o' greenhouse tomatoes, whereas r-espondeni were tr-ing to expand the definition to include all tresh market to- matoes. The [TC TLrcIoni/:-d the diille-rim.c'. in production practices bctwen field-grown and Lrccnhlouc-vrwlil tomatoes but rblic\cd the products to be iintie.hn.ingcblk. even though rciail members ol the trade etikeii to the con- trary. Testing for like Prnduct The foregouiiir anal'..i sugge~.- the strong p '',hl1ii1'y IlI i\ hlllcreni outcome had the def- inition of the "di--Jdomei lik product" been grccnhluuc tomatoes instead of all tomatoes. It further suggests the need for a more objec- tive and transparent approach to be used by the ITC in such determinations. The approach decioped below lollo' s from earil work done on the integration of spatial markets (Lele; Rnallmluai Rather than .aLdrL-%ing spatial closeness of markeis. market inltgr.L- tion in the present context is addressed from the perspective of closeness Ol' Ir racteristics of commodities as evaluated Ib the market- rcel Toniatcrs rao m Melico, ITC Pub. 2967. Inv. No, 7 1I-T.'-77 'f riin *J I ,', awn u 6 to I I, _