the Congress has designated the project as a Reclamation project or
has integrated it with or made it a part of a Reclamation project, or
(2) in addition to the project works constructed by the Corps, the Sec-
retary of the Interior pursuant to the Federal Reclamation Law has
also provided project works for control or conveyance of an agricul-
tural water supply to the lands in question, or (3) the Congress has
by statute explicitly made the Reclamation Law applicable to the
project or lands in question.
 It is the intention of the Committee that the Corps exemption shall
apply to the projects on the Kings, Kern, Kaweah and Tule Rivers in
California authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944 (58 Stat. 887).
Furthermore, it is the intention of the Committee that the criteria
specified in subparagraphs (1), (2) and (3) shall not be construed to
apply to the projects constructed on those rivers under the authority
of that Act.
 It is the general intent of this section to eliminate the shadow of
applicability of the Reclamation Law to Corps of Engineers projects
in any case in which the intent of Congress concerning such applica-
bility is not clearly and explicitly set forth in statutory language.
 Section 8. (e)-This section exempts from the acreage limitations,
lands which receive a water supply in two circumstances.
 The first such circumstance applies to lands which might in un-
usually wet years be capable of being served with an irrigation water
supply involving the use of Reclamation project facilities, but which
would have no dependable water supply upon which a continuing
irrigated farming operation could be economically based, and lands
which may be capable of short term water service during flood flows
only.
 The acreage limitation, the Committee believes, in such instances
should not act as a deterrent to putting available water to beneficial
use. The Committee notes as examples the experience of the Madera,
Chowochilla and La Branze Districts in the Friaut Division of the
Central Valley Project in California.
 The second circumstances covered by this section is that in which
leases of 1 year or less are used as a management arrangement among
landholders to permit the consolidation of partial water supplies in
unusually dry years.
 Again, the Committee believes that the acreage limitation should not
act to restrain prudent water conservation in emergency situations.
The Committee notes the example of the Arch-Hurley District in New
Mexico, which has experienced several years of low water availability.
 Section 8. (f)-This section permits the delivery of water to minor
tracts of land in excess of a landholder's acreage limit if the Secretary
determines that such tracts could not otherwise be viably operated.
 Section 8. (g) -This section provides that when excess lands are
sold to qualified recipients who have landholdings in conformance
with the acreage limitation, water service to such formerly excess
lands will for 10 years be conditioned upon an agreement on the part
of the landowner that any resale must be at a price reflecting no more
than the landowner's initial cost increased by the subsequent rate of
increase of the Consumer Price Index plus the market value of any
improvements made by the landowner.