majority of the members, more confident of speaking in public, and you will most likely have more technical knowledge compared with the farmers. However, ifyou see your purpose as stimulating a range of views on a particular issue, then it is more important that you ask the right questions rather than give all the answers. If members direct questions at you, then often you will need to redirect them to the group. And, by occasionally summarizing the contributions, you will be building on the ideas and opinions of the participants. ORGANIZING GROUP DISCUSSIONS However informal and lively the interaction, effective discussion usually depends on careful planning. The leader needs to be familiar with the topics under discussion; informed about the backgrounds and interests of the participants; and prepared with the issues he thinks should be explored or the questions he wants to raise. Group size is also an important factor. Between six and twelve members can engage in a purposeful, yet relaxed, discussion-a group small enough for all members to feel they can contribute; large enough for any shy member not to feel exposed. If the group is too large it can be divided into subgroups which can break off to discuss a specific topic and then "report-back" on their conclusions to the large group. One way to conform to traditional patterns of discussion might be to base the division into subgroups of age sets. The seating arrangements will also affect performance. Fluidity of interaction will depend not only on whether everyone can be heard but also on whether their body language can be read. In everyday encounters we are used to picking up the signs that someone wants to say something (the lift of the head or the opening of the mouth); that someone has finished speaking (the slight turning away of the eyes). A look in someone's direction can signal an invitation to contribute; a smile can relieve a tense moment. All these body and eye movements are important in facilitating and adjusting the flow of talk. If a group is seated such that people cannot easily see each other, then these vital visual cues will be missed and the flow of talk impeded. Where you, as "visiting expert", sit will have a strong influence too. If you sit in a central or dominant chair, then this will often be taken as signal that you will be tightly controlling the proceedings in a traditional "teacher/leader" manner. Sometimes the simple act of taking up a less prominent position can prompt more initiatives from the participants.