like technological advance, institutional progress and improvements in the human agent, is a necessary com- ponent of agricultural progress. We concentrate in this report on technological ad- vance and on related advances necessary to get new technologies created and used. Suggestions are offered for research on institutions, human development and capital accumulation to take advantage of the techno- logical research. This report, however, is not balanced. It deals only with the institutional, human develop- ment and capital accumulation research necessary to take advantage of technological advances. It does not adequately treat the need for research on institutions, human resources and additional capital. Research on these subjects is required to attain objectives other than the creation of new technology. Agricultural research has more to contribute to the well-being of society than just the creation of new technologies. Categories of Agricultural Research Three broad categories of agricultural research can be distinguished and are discussed here: disciplinary (DISC), subject-matter (SM) and problem-solving (PS). Disciplinary Research This is research designed to improve a discipline, such as biochemistry, economics, genetics, sociology, cell microbiology or physics. DISC research improves the basic theory of a discipline, contributes knowledge and measurements of the phenomena of interest to it and improves the techniques available to it. DISC research can be of either known or unknown relevance. Agriculture is dependent on relevant advances in the biological, physical and social science disciplines and in the humanistic disciplines, as well. Subject-Matter Research This is multidisciplinary research on a subject of im- portance to a relatively well defined set of decision makers facing a relatively well defined set of practical problems in the real world. If research on such a sub- ject is not multidisciplinary, it becomes relevant DISC research. By decision makers we refer to the farmers, homemakers, experiment station directors, govern- mental officials and others who decide on solutions for the everyday practical private and public problems of agriculture and food. SM research is done to produce and organize multidisciplinary bodies of knowledge for the use of sets of such decision makers. It is important to distinguish this type of research from disciplinary and problem-solving research because their objectives, financing and administrative requirements are substantially different. Failure to realize these differences is at the heart of many of the ARE's difficulties with its public image, funding and internal administration. Most departments in colleges of agriculture are multidisciplinary SM departments. In a sense, such departments are more like institutes than the disciplines of traditional universities. Agronomy, for instance, provides information about soils and crops useful to rather well defined sets of farmers tackling problems involving production of cer- tain crops. Agronomy departments are not specialized in a single discipline. Instead, they are multidisciplinary and typically include scientists with disciplinary skills in chemistry, physics, genetics, statistics, plant physiology, bacteriology and economics, to list only a few of the disciplines that con- tribute to the SM research and teaching of an agronomy department. Similar conclusions can be reached about animal science, agricultural economics and horticulture departments. One of the earmarks of SM departments is that they are multidisciplinary. Another distinction is that SM research seldom generates information sufficient in and of itself to solve a specific problem faced by any of the decision makers being served. The typical decision maker ordinarily supplements information generated by SM research with other information to solve a specific problem. A farmer, for instance, using the results of agronomic research to solve a crop rotation problem, typically has to supplement such research results with knowledge about prices, markets, his machinery and equipment, his livestock program and the availability of his labor, as well as that of his family and hired persons. Problem-Solving Research The USDA/agricultural college establishment has responsibility for conducting much problem-solving (PS) research and extension work. Such work typically focuses on a specific problem faced by a specific deci- sion maker or set of decision makers. For example, dairy farmers in Michigan a few years ago needed to find a more labor-efficient way of handling milk. The problem was solved by a combination of agricultural engineers, dairy husbandry specialists, economists and bacteriologists. Their combined work produced dairy production systems involving combinations of bulk milk tanks, greatly improved "herringbone" milking parlors, facilities for handling feeds and animal wastes, and buildings for housing dairy animals, all adapted to help solve the problem of using labor more efficiently on Michigan farms. Problem-solving research, like SM research, is multidisciplinary.