Chapter 3 Respondents in household surveys can also be asked about household food stocks and their own perceptions of their food needs and food security. Nutrition status information can also be collected, but this has to be done in conjunction with information on health status, sanitation and maternal care, so as not to give a misleading impression of food security problems. It is often too expensive to collect comprehensive information on food consumption, though questions on the frequency of consumption of major food items may be cheaper to collect. As with national monitoring systems, the temptation must be resisted to develop comprehensive, but expensive questionnaires which cover everything but are not cost-effective. Box 3.6 Food Security Monitoring in Namibia Shortly after Independence in 1990, FAO provided technical assistance to Namibian government in setting up an Early Warning and Food Information System (EWFIS) in the Ministry of Agriculture. This reported on agro-meteorological information, crop production estimates and grazing conditions. Information was released by means of a Monthly Crops Bulletin during the growing season, a Quarterly Food Security Bulletin and special Crop Updates and Food Security Updates as required. During the drought of 1992/93, the Namibian Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Namibia was funded to initiate the development of a household food security monitoring system to complement the national and regional information provided by EWFIS. This project identified a number of sentinel villages which were surveyed on a monthly basis, to provide information at a household level on food production, livestock sales and livestock deaths, income transfers, collection of drought foods, remaining food stocks and the extent to which households received food from the Drought Relief Programme. Participation in emergency Food for Work programmes was also monitored. This monitoring system provided valuable information on which regions of the country and types of household were most severely affected by drought. It also provided useful information on the effectiveness and scope of the Drought Relief Programme in the field. Unfortunately, funding for the programme ran out shortly after the end of the drought, so it was not possible to institutionalise household monitoring as part of EWFIS, as had originally been hoped. However, the project is being revived as part of the Namibian follow-up to the International Conference on Nutrition, and it is hoped to add anthropometric information to the data to be collected, to give a fuller picture of household food security. In some countries, certain vulnerable regions have decentralised, locally-based information systems, where the information is reported to the local community in the first instance. This can be very effective if there is some local autonomy and control over resources which allows for a quick response to emerging problems. Communities may well have local information which allows then to interpret the results of monitoring systems more accurately than statistical teams in the capital, and local planning committees are often more immediately responsive and responsible to the community. Turkana district in Kenya, which is extremely drought prone, has had such a system for a number of years. A pilot scheme is also being implemented in Kilifi district, where the problems are those of chronic food insecurity rather than those of transitory food shocks. - 101 -