There is an element of subjectivity about the assessment of these assumptions. For a more extensive discussion the reader is referred to Chap. 7 of Mead and Cumow (1983). In brief, the experimenter should ask: 1 Does it seem reasonable, and do the data appear to confirm that the ranges of values for each treatment are broadly similar and that there is no trend for treatments giving generally higher yields to display a correspondingly greater range? In biological material it is more reasonable to suppose that treatments with a high mean yield also have a rather higher variance of yield. and so an experimenter should be prepared to recognize this occurrence and to use a transformation of yield before analysis. 2 Are treatment differences similar in the"good" blocks and in the "bad" blocks? Again if the pattern of bigger differences in better blocks, which might reasonably be expected, is found, then a transformation of yield is necessary. 3 Do I believe that an approximately normal distribution is a sensible assumption? Table 2. Analysis of Variance and Tables of Means for Cowpea Data in Intercrop Trial at IITA, Nigeria Analysis of variance Source SS df MS F Blocks 73,000 2 36,500 2.8 Maize varieties (M) 409,400 2 204.700 15.7a Cowpea varieties (C) 6,000 I 6,000 0.5 Nitrogen (N) 113,10W 3 37,700 2.9 M x C 9,900 2 4,950 0.4 MxN 67,600 6 11,267 0.9 CxN 172,400 3 57,433 4.4b MxCxN 135,400 6 22,567 1.7 Error 599,300 46 13.000 Table of means (cowpea yield (kg/ha) Nitrogen level Cowpea variety 0 40 80 120 Maize variety Mean A 482 459 413 511 1 582 B 597 497 479 367 2 430 Mean 539 478 446 439 3 415 SE of difference for N means = 50 SE of difference 43 SE of difference for combinations = 71 aSignificant at 0.1% level bSignificant at 5% level. Source: Data from Dr. Ezumah, IITA, unpublished.