I '' confusion in the argument put forward and I am not quite clear as to the reason fdr th- ,opp6sition td the Holmes Commission Report. Is it that the Honourable Member is opposing Unificationi as such, or is it that he thinks that unification will prove a- bar to Fedeiation, or that unification \yill be, of no value-.before Federation, or is it that he thinks that a Federal Servie in itself will,be a unified service? If the last premise is the.one on h ich he is basing his argument,: then I believe I am right ini saying that only a certain number of services .will be affected by Federation. The Federal, Government Will 'only federate the Administration,. Judiciary, Customs; and Post .Office.S&'ivices at some future date. Those are the. only federal, services that will' come int6 force 6ri Federation, therefore it is not. a. choice of ".unified or "federal" services. On referring to that portion of the resolution which reads as follows : "Whereas stlps are now being taken'to effect early establishment of a Federation of these British Caribbean territories, whereby a Federal Service would automatically come into existence ", ohe would be inclined to think that a Federal Ser.ice v. i t ae ithie place of a Unified Service, but that is not so. The question of unification will still remain to be decided upon. The Honourable Member maintains that the Holmes- C'omnlssion, .backed by; the Federation ofCivil Service A'so. iati:n., of the British Caribbean area. believe that. Unification will b1e no bar to Fe- dl,-.r iiio,, but that the Rance- Committee takes .the opposite view. if, however, you look, at paragraph 119 of the.Rance Report, you will see that this is not so. That paragraph, reads as follows : "We 'turn now. to. the. question of the. unLifiC.tior of the public services. This has been the u1'l:,lect. of.an exhaustive report by the Commission under Sir; Maurice -Hoilm, s. and we,,refer, to the matter,.in so far as it directly irmpigfrii oii federation, ,iinthe' precediri, .Part of this Report;. So far as c:ncern-, re i.-fedlr':al ctiliQl, and nation in respect of such services as are not ,:-deralisie* iand which therefore remain subject to- local control, we cannot usefully do more than commend, the findingsof 'the Holmes-Commission to the careful ponsideratiob of all concerned. In particular, we attach cardinal importance to thl ci' icptioni of the Pablic, Service Commission, which cannot fail even ii1 present circumstances to: exercise. a steady and wholly benefiial ufifyi: in fltuence on the secr ices .with:,which it deals, even while their, control remains as at present. distributed among numerous different Governments. In .addition, we wish to draw particular, attention to the Commission's; observations on the matter of entry into the-public services of the.region, in particular to its proposals for the establishmnentt;of, a cadet. grade inl,the administrative services to which university graduates would be - appointed-.., We ued not reflearse the Holmep Commission's- discussion of this. matter, but we call attention to paragraph 45 of that Reports, in which it is stated that-: so long as.a sufficient number, of highly educated West Indians arg not recruited, direct to the administrative class, so long will it need to be strengthened by recruitment from outside the region.'., We cannot but agree with the,.Commission that. the present system makes.it virtually, impossible -for the young .West Indian with a University degree to consider direct .entry S into the administrative class of the- public service. It is opportune, that-this obstacle should be speedily removed, since with the establishment..of :the- University,College, of the, West Indies there will in a few years be, a supply of. young men of good. education who might play a valuable part in the publicsb service,of theregi h, provided that appropriate conditions. of entry.exist. , Your Honour,, I do not propose to take up finch more of the time of this:, Councilin .this.ma.ter. Iagree with the mover of the coun.te-mzotp ,tha9t,,' hia:-I