420

342 Part 1 + 3562S + /-:na/ (La Paz, Calacoa, Sitajara, Jopoqueri,
Salinas, Morcomarca; also Bertonio
1603b)

3+2 RDK (non /-ya-/) (Socca, also cited in Ebbing 1965)
3+2 RDK (/-ya-/) (Juli)
+343 D-2 /sa/ form (Ebbing 1965)

*7-ta-/ 2p mark + 3+2 RDK (non /-ya-/) (Ebbing 1965)

The other forms are

2>+1 Socca /-iri-/ + 2+] D-2 /sa/ form /-itasama:na/ = /-iritasama:na/
3+1 /-iri-/ + contrary-to-fact mark + 351 RDK (non /-ya-/)

3+4 /-iri-/ + contrary-to-fact mark + 354 RDK (non /-ya-/)

Sitajara 3+1 and 3-4 have fallen together. The 3+] form
has apparently fallen out, leaving only 3+4 for both.

On the other hand, in Morocomarca 3+4 appears to be
falling out, as at first the 3+1 form was given for

both 3+1 and 3-4.
6-3.34.3 Dialectal patterning of /sa/ and /iri/ forms

A comparison of the incidence of /iri/ and /sa/
forms in the D-1 and D-2 tenses shows that, as might

be expected, the most complete paradigms for both sets