476 Ch. 31. No. 1.] Companies. Effect of supervision order. Debts of all descriptions to be proved. as if he had been duly appointed in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance with respect to the appointment of liquidators in a voluntary winding up. (3) The Court may remove any liquidator so appointed by the Court or any liquidator continued under the supervision order and fill any vacancy occasioned by the removal, or by death or resignation. 247. (1) Where an order is made for a winding up subject to supervision, the liquidator may, subject to any restric- tions imposed by the Court, exercise all his powers, without the sanction or intervention of the Court, in the same manner as if the company were being wound up altogether voluntarily: Provided that the powers specified in paragraphs (d), (e) and (f) of subsection (1) of section 182 shall not be exercised by the liquidator except with the sanction of the Court or, in a case where before the order the winding up was a creditors’ voluntary winding up, with the sanction of either the Court or the committee of inspection. (2) A winding up subject to the supervision of the Court is not a winding up by the Court for the purpose of the provisions of this Ordinance which are set out in the Fighth Schedule to this Ordinance, but, subject as afore- said, an order for a winding up subject to supervision shall for all purposes be deemed to be an order for winding up by the Court: Provided that where the order for winding up subject to supervision was made in relation to a creditors’ voluntary winding up in which a committee of inspection had been appointed, the order shall be deemed to be an order for winding up by the Court for the purpose of section 190, except in so far as the operation of that section is excluded in a voluntary winding up by rules. (v) PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO EVERY MODE OF WINDING UP. Proof and ranking of claims. 248. In every winding up (subject in the case of insolvent companies to the application in accordance with the pro-