POSTSCRIPT small to support either the fantasized "body behind the text" or the literal textual body itself, unsettling this massive, spooky figure. The designs used to open regions A, B, and C above similarly arouse the anxiety that accom- panies viewing such cut-away bodily images. Imagining the drawings complete behind the text by connecting the lines that have been cut off by the sharp borders of the word-spaces requires a surrealistic bodily dis-memberment and re-memberment. In ruthlessly cutting off the drive toward closure and completeness that informs the ordinary, ego-affirming visual imagination, this incisive, dis-membering tabula rasa literally opens up a space to be filled in by language. By denying access to the (imaginary) unified visual body of another, this interposition of the (sym- bolic) cutting edge that opens up a space for words threatens the unity of the viewer's own ego-body-an enactment of the textual castration explored by Jacques Lacan and others. But Blake undoes this primary cut by making the visible words of his text resist absorption into phallocentric grammar. The spectator's desire to complete the drawing behind the text in these examples parallels the reader's urge to find an ur-narrative behind the poem. On the physical page, of course, there is literally nothing behind the verbal text, for the rectangular space and the inscribed words con- stitute their own complete visual field. Likewise there is literally no primordial story behind the surface details of the poem's narrative. The presumption of such a story dissolves under close scrutiny of particulars. At the one point in the manuscript where Blake sketched in the completion of a Night Thoughts design, the sketch disrupts the lines of poetry. Thus on page 137 of The Four Zoas (page 348 above), where Blake curved the left margin of the verbal text around the sketched-in completed wrestling figures, the lines of poetry are compressed (show ideological and aesthetic stress) precisely where the poem's syntax unequivocally asserts Los's identity with Urthona. Central to the argument of Narrative Unbound is the possibility that this syntactic reduction of Los to Urthona threatens the revisionary ontology of the poem. Thus, the two figures wrestling do not simply allegorize the reader's resistive struggle with this apocalyptic text (though this is certainly a dimension of the design's subversive referentiality) but also the struggle between Los and Urthona for ontological priority over one another at the close of the poem-figures frozen in a twisting identity-in-difference. Significantly, this point of stress is the only instance in The Four Zoas manuscript where Blake displaces the verbal text in favor of an intruding "completed" drawing, as if such completion itself ontologically displaces the status of the literal words on the page. On page 126, the verso side of one of the Night Thoughts designs, Blake invokes an opposite strategy. Instead of hiding the figure behind the text, he draws a weird creature whose eyes peer out through the word "reorganize," a visual pun requiring an act of double reading that "reor- ganizes" the organs of our eyes: it "re-organs-(our)-eyes." Since in many of Blake's finished "illuminated"works there is little direct correspondence in content between design and accompanying verbal text, it is hardly surprising that drawings made to illustrate another poem, serving later as worksheets, should bear approximate and, at best, problematic relation to the content of the inscribed text. Yet, remarkably, the examples incor- porated in Narrative Unbound selected primarily on the basis of their structural or thematic relevance to the argument of the sections of this book also seem to suggest complex interconnec- tions between the visual and verbal dimensions of The Four Zoas. It remains a choice to see this connectedness either as a matter of coincidence or a sign offundamental interrelatedness, open to ongoing definition. Blake's words on the opening and closing illustrations for Narrative Unbound, for example,