OVERRIDES: THE LUVAH/VALA PLOT and prevent the further separation of the female from the male, this embrace suddenly-and precisely in the context of the feast-creates the preconditions for sexual separation as such. The narrator's emphasis on the Eternal Men's perception of the separated female draws attention away from the fact that the "Eternal Men" embody or enact an implicit division of the Eternal Man himself (that is, the narrator's perceptual bias obscures the fact that seeing the female separate equals the Eternal Man's own division). Since the multiple Eternal Men meet as if in order "to see / The female form now separate," the division of the Eternal Man becomes an aspect of the separation of the female, and vice versa. The embrace of Tharmas and Enion thus occasions, through the mediation of the feast, what appears to be an originary or primal separation of male from female. It is crucial that this female is not named but treated as if generic, for the convoluted context opens up the possibility that this female is Jerusalem. In their division in Night I, Tharmas hid Jerusalem (4:9) and Enion wove a taber- nacle for Jerusalem (5:6-7); thus the union of Tharmas and Enion could disclose or unconceal Jerusalem as an aspect of the poem's sexual jealousy plot. Since the Eternal Man's female Emanation Jerusalem (19:1) has been claimed as "bride & wife" of the Lamb of God, according to the Eternal Man's lecture to Urizen (122:16-17), the Eternal Men's revulsion from their sudden consciousness of the "female separate" could be the way the Eternal Man perceives the intersection of his own speech to Urizen with the Tharmas/Enion union. In this reading the feast celebrates the hidden wedding ofJerusalem and the Lamb which separates Jerusalem from the Eternal Man. The Luvah/Vala Plot. Luvah and Vala function,just as the feast does, in a double role-as a linear override plot and as an embedded structure. The Luvah/Vala embedded structure is bounded by their descent into and their actions within their radically isolated world, but the linear plot featuring these characters extends almost to the end of the poem -specifically to the point at which the Eternal Man casts out Luvah and Vala, at the boundary between the Eternal Man bracket and the final Los/Urthona embedded structure (137:30-31). Unlike the linear trumpet sound, whose hidden features discontinuously surface and climax at the feast by creating the trumpet sound's own preconditions and then disappear, and unlike the feast plot that crops up at various discontinuous moments in the narrative as a stationary landscape to which the action keeps returning, the Luvah/ Vala linear plot is evasive, covert, and difficult to sight, though it displays a movement and direction that the characters and the narrator often fail to perceive. Because Luvah's ambivalent actions systematically mystify other characters as well as the narrator, the movement of the Luvah/Vala plot remains fundamentally invisible (the guise under which Luvah often explicitly appears) and therefore requires further analysis, even at this The separation of the female from the Eternal Men at the feast as a sub- versive enactment of the Lamb's appropriation of Jerusalem as his "bride & wife" The nearly invisible movement toward power of the Luvah/Vala plot