FOUR ZOAS IX / 117:24-139:5 (16:17-139:5) Possible Resolution through Male/Female Union The problematic dimen- sions of the male/female unions in Night IX The Enitharmon/ Urthona union: a confu- sion of Spectres See below, pp. 459-62. The Urizen/Ahania union: death, rebirth, and disappearance Of all the events that could constitute a resolution in the plot itself, one of Blake's most tempting options is to unite the central male figures with their female Emanations. By presenting these attempted unions in an apparently calculated progression in Night IX, Blake lures the reader (even at this late date) into hoping that each of these unions is acting as a stage in a process of narrative integration. Blake invokes these unions, however, only to undermine their positive potential as unambiguous phases of an integrative scheme. For instance, given the important role Los and Enitharmon played in Nights VIIa and VIII and in the beginning of IX, their union could well function as a dramatic moment of resolution. Following Los and Enithar- mon's eating the fruit of the Tree of Mystery in Night VIIa, the narrator predicted that they would unite after "six thousand Years of self denial and of bitter Contrition" (87:29), a period of time that coincides with that which Los asserted in his speech to Rahab in Night VIII had passed since his fall (113:48-49): Los's utterance could thus signify the imminence of their integration. In Night IX, however, Los is suddenly replaced by the Spectre ofUrthona who "Reciev[es]" with merely a "faint embrace" "The Spectre of Enitharmon" (a problematic new figure that fuses male func- tion with female name); this faint embrace allows them to unite only two dimensionally as "Two shadows mingle." This union does not issue in uninterrupted joy; rather these aspects of Urthona experience "joy mixd with despair & grief/ Their bodies buried in the ruins of the Universe" (117:24-118:5). This event constitutes more a dissolution than a union, since as soon as they embrace the two Spectres vanish from the poem, remaining narratively buried until the end of Night IX. Even in the last few lines of the poem the narrator is unable to affirm, except through negative, passive, and problematic syntax, that the conventional aspects of Urthona apparently integrate. The narrator does not assert that Los is united with Enitharmon but rather, Urthona is "no longer now / Divided from Enitharmon" (139:4-5). In the detailed analysis of this passage we shall see how the account of this union near the poem's end calls attention to the narrator's evasive assertion itself. The union ofUrizen and Ahania comes in two stages, each with its own center offrustration. As soon as Urizen delivers a repentance speech under threat of being cast out by the Eternal Man, Urizen undergoes a miracu- lous and instantaneous physical reversal, and Ahania reappears running toward him in joy, only to drop dead of burst blood vessels (121:35-37). Blake clouds the second phase of their union in two more subtle ways. First, Ahania does not return until Urizen and his sons have sat down to their "repose" at the emerging feast, opening up the possibility that Ahania's second rebirth is technically a dream which the narrator fails to distinguish as such. (The fact that Urizen rises from his couch as if awak- ening when she reappears does not erase this possibility.) Second, she