FOUR ZOAS VIIA-VIII / 85:31-113:36 (12:25-113:36) Narrative conditioning of Los and Enitharmon's conflicting responses to the return of the Lamb The Lamb intersects all three transformed ele- ments: the Tree of Mys- tery, the war, and weaving. The Lamb's role in the weaving plot: in the narrative proper; lished this opposition in Night I when Urizen accused Jesus of being the "soft delusion of Eternity," and Urizen himself claimed to be "God the terrible destroyer & not the Saviour" (12:25-26). In that speech in Night I Urizen made no reference to the Lamb despite its underlying role in the development of overlapping contexts. Indeed, it is unlikely that Urizen is ever aware of the image of the Lamb as such in the poem (when he sees the Lamb in Luvah's robes, for example, he perceives the Lamb as a form of Luvah [101:1-6]). Yet the conclusion to Urizen's speech in Night I, that "the Spectre is the Man," has been partially con- firmed by the unfolding ambiguous nature of the Lamb. The Lamb's first appearance in the poem resulted in a modulation of the "feminine" around and within the "universal Man" into a "form of vegetation" around "the Spectre" in Night I. Thus, in its initial appearance the Lamb mediates a shift of emphasis from the "Man" to the "Spectre." On the other hand, in Night VIIa, Los embraces the Spectre and gives up his "Domineering lust" (85:31) because the Spectre speaks: "look upon me / Not as another but as thy real Self I am thy Spectre / Tho horrible & Ghastly to thine Eyes ... hear what inspired I speak" (85:37-40). This utterance nearly re-enacts Urizen's speech in Night I. Though it should be difficult to accept Los's and reject Enitharmon's words concerning the Lamb's function, Blake has constituted his narrative in a manner designed to make most of his readers desperately need to do so. The re-surfacing of the Lamb into central importance at the end of VIIa and more urgently in VIII can be no simple matter. The Lamb is intimately involved in all three of the overlapping transformed structures: he is nailed to the Tree of Mystery; he appears both inside the woven form of Jerusalem and in the weaving/unweaving/reweaving syndrome of Rahab as it is assimilated to the processes of vegetation; and he operates in the context of the war to "perplex and terrify" Urizen. Let us look briefly at the Lamb's involvement in the weaving plot. The Lamb appears unexpectedly "within Jerusalems Veil" (104:2) as Los and Enitharmon are engaged in fabricating bodies (initially female counter- parts) for the (male) spectres. Once this male-female complex assumes the form of a "Family," however, the role of the females is structurally replaced by Jerusalem and, surprisingly, the role of the spectres is structurally replaced by the Lamb of God. In this narrative account the Lamb is inextricably involved in the woven form of the dead, the males without female counterparts who "burst forth from the bottoms of their tombs" (85:18) in an inverse resurrection, descending from Beulah into Ulro (99:19-21), the space originally created by the Daughters of Beulah for the Circle of Destiny, one name for the woven form of the Spectre of Thar- mas. In Night VIIb these myriad dead (who are to be woven in VIII) are "namd Satans & in the Aggregate they namd Them Satan" (95:14). This complex of overlapping events constitutes a fundamental structural con- nection between Satan and the Lamb which suggests that they are perspec- tive transformations of one another.