CLOSURE AND OPENING The text lures the reader into experiencing a delu- sion, into believing in a false apocalypse. that the poem's events are linearly unfolding re-enactments of a single unapproachable, pre-existent moment, all the while undermining the possibility of such a privileged primordial event. In addition, begin- ning especially in Night VIIa, the narrative begins to open up the desire (even hold out the hope) that the knotted complexities and paradoxes of that precipitating event, which always seems outside the text, will be revealed, reversed, and resolved within the text itself in Night IX. The asymmetry is obvious: in this reading, the precipitating event cannot be directly dramatized but the resolving event can be. There is, however, strong evidence that one dimension of the ostensible precipitating event (the "fall") finally materializes in the text itself at the moment the apocalyptic reunion of Tharmas and Enion takes place -in which case it is the most radical case of retroactive constitution/canceling out in the poem. The Dialectic of the Text The emergence of the dialogically constituted "narrator" from the gaps in the text Text as Flight. The subversive microscopic surface of The Four Zoas narrative is the aspect we have identified with Tharmas' withdrawal beneath the oceanic surface in the Circle of Destiny episode. Indeed, this is no unique act by Tharmas: he is constantly perceived as fleeing from confrontations, leaving in his wake perceptual vortexes and voids. Thar- mas' compulsive fleeing reappears as an aspect of the text under the guise of discrepancies, gaps, and discontinuities. Perhaps the most problematic point at which to enter the text under the aspect of flight is one of the points that caused Blake the greatest difficulty (as evidenced by massive deletions and revisions) -the opening lines of the poem itself. In the first eight lines of the poem proper, the narrative voice divides into a sequential dialogue or dialectic whose physical, spatial layout on the page possesses significance in itself. The first three lines focus on the "Song of the Aged Mother"; the next three lines emphasize the "Universal Brotherhood"; and from the last two lines of this sequence the "Heavenly Father" emerges. (This family constellation is further completed when the "Daughter ofBeulah" appears six lines later.) The physical relationship of these three segments to one another on the space of the page sandwiches the Brotherhood between the Mother (on top) and the Father (below). In so doing these lines embody a fundamental discrepancy ideographically: is it significant that the Brotherhood has come spatially between the Aged Mother and the Heavenly Father? And why does the physical arrangement of the lines of the text seem to invert the traditional spatial arrangement (by analogy with nature) in which the "Heavenly Father" is a sky god above and the "Aged Mother" is the earth below? If we read this spatial descent down the page as signifying a temporal order, it is possible that the sequence of the lines embodies a narrative sequence in which the Aged Mother's matriarchy precedes the seizure of power by the sons, and the