empted if meeting the require- ments of Section 161.053(6)(c). The law also requires a map- ping of undeveloped coastal bar- rier areas. The coastal preserva- tion policy was strengthened specifying that no state funds shall be used for constructing bridges or causeways to coastal barrier islands which were not connected on the effective date of this bill (October 1, 1985). Fur- thermore, no unobligated state funds may be expended for in- creasing the capacity of infra- structure in the coastal building zone or on a coastal barrier island, except when consistent with the coastal element of the local gov- ernment comprehensive plan. A new building zone is also es- tablished by this law which in- cludes the land area 1,500 feet inland of the coastal construc- tion control line, or, if there is no control line, 3,000 feet inland of the mean high water line. In this area, stringent building standards will apply, centered around load factors capable of withstanding 140 mph winds. Developments of Regional Impact The final section of the bill at- tempts to streamline the devel- opment of regional impact (DRI) process. A DRI is a proposed project, due to its character, magnitude, or location, which would have a substantial impact upon the health, safety, or wel- fare of citizens of more than one county. Of course, large resi- dential developments, shopping centers, regional airports, ports and mining proposals normally fall within this process. HB 287 encourages participation in the DRI process by establishing fixed thresholds with a presump- tive banding. A "band" of 80 to 120 percent of the applicable thresholds is established. Devel- opments within the "band" would be subject to the presumption. Certain provisions of the bill al- low the Department of Com- munity Affairs, the Regional Planning Council or local gov- ernment to petition the Gover- nor and Cabinet for an increase or decrease of a threshold up to 50%, upon approval of the Legislature. This law also authorizes de- velopers of a DRI to enter into preliminary agreements with the DCI which will allow the de- veloper to proceed to develop up to 25% of a DRI prior to re- ceiving DRI approval. Limitations are also estab- lished on development order "exactions" (contributions of money and land made by devel- opers) from an applicant. The developer of a DRI may not be required by local governments to provide for land or public fa- cilities beyond that required of all developers. Facilities con- tributed by the developer of a DRI may be credited against impact fees required by local government to meet the same public facility needs. 1985 Only a Beginning The year 1985 should be viewed as merely the beginning of significant changes in our laws and regulations that will substantially impact Florida's built environment. Much of the responsibility for the implemen- tation of positive changes in ac- cordance with House Bill 287 as well as influencing further posi- tive legislation is borne by the ar- chitectural profession in Florida. After all, you are the designers of Florida's built environment. J. Michael Huey is General Coun- sel to the FA/AIA. He is a part- ner in the firm ofAkerman Sen- terfitt & Eidson, Tallahassee. Picture color and texture In concrete. SThen talk to Scofield. Witi Sciteld alm nrid te~urrig9 syslenisa concre ier.omes olive 1 As the folcat poirnror ci Cm'rpIh~ierlt 1c. your design icield gives yt'u rhe cost-efective locils to loke trin omoinory, Lno make Ii embaordinoty The Scofield system. Fromi benulild Qroan-I pinls to ricr grays' Sicxeids CHOM '`Adii 'Tures give yo:u uribomr nea-foding olnr-Concitmultd c Qncrete in n vrluctIVY infinite 'pectrun= crl stondaid or cutslcni rotu-Jrs Add cipcilive tAiur ond Sthadorjw interest With Ou higri- teuseeloslonierlc LITHOTEY.' FornhliMrS o-1 fritheposs0bittIs are endlesi, The Scofield promise. We.ve pil cmlor and trpture in u;onrfto for ove 5i2 years Our systems wclrirt4 It 'yU OAOnt 0 PiPJIect. ITiOin* grel aind stay lookirj grwOt. piCture colot and faxuie in - oonerte Then 0oSccfield. ;, % I.7 FLORIDA ARCHITECT September/October 1985 r';tE