the most important requirement for good design is sound informa- tion. The computer, not as a simu- lator, but as an information ma- chine, helps. We are experimenting with a program to retrieve data on build- ing materials. Using this, it is pos- sible to rapidly compare relative characteristics of many construc- tion systems. In this case, the value of the program is not its ability to calculate, but in its ability to select information in a specified way .. . Graphic Data Processing . Probably one of the biggest impacts on architectural design may come from a new field of computer capability-graphic data processing. Computers were first able only to process numbers. Then they developed the capabil- ity to handle letters. Now graphic data processing is becoming a reality. When graphic data process- ing becomes more economical, it will have a tremendous effect on the process of architecture not only in the production of working drawings, but in design. At CRS, we are very anxious for this technology to come. During the last two years, we've been working hard to change our ap- proach to construction systems and accompanying g r a p h i c systems. The philosophy is this: we should view construction as an assembly, not of details, but of total systems -a structural system, window wall system, a partitioning system. And if we are able to think about build- ing in this way, we will be able to detail t h e s e systems separately, without thinking of them as ap- plied to a specific building. These systems theoretically will then ap- ply to more than one project. The information which describes their properties, their details and graph- ics will be stored on magnetic tape, or discs which then can be re- trieved by computer, modified by light pen and cathode ray tube by a designer, and then produced on working drawings by a computer driven plotter. This will allow the architects in the firm to spend their efforts to create better sys- tems, working on specific designs rather than grinding out another set of working drawings. Now this isn't as "cloud nine" as it may sound. It is possible to make architectural drawings with a computer. CRS and others have done it. Hardware is available. At the moment, the problem is not hardware but software the pro- grams to operate the machines. It's still difficult to get drawings into the computer-lengthy, clumsy instructions have to be written. The techniques for filing these drawings, retrieving them and reproducing them again are still difficult and expensive. But if the progress in graphic data pro- cessing over the next five years equals the progress in alpha-nu- meric processing over the last five years, we shall all be working with computers in our drafting depart- ment . . Questions and Answers . Some questions no doubt come to mind: 1. How much does it cost? Computer time is surprisingly inexpensive. It is often calcu- lated and charged in hundred- ths of a minute. The real cost of computer operations is devel- oping the capabilities of people and programs. We haven't thor- ough experience yet, but a wild swinging guess would estimate computer operations at 4 to 5 times the actual hardware costs. The hardware costs vary. You might run a routine program in accounting at a local service bureau, or $50 a month, or lease a small but complete com- puter for $1500 a month. An elaborate system with a light pen and a cathode ray tube might go for $20,000 a month. 2. How big does a firm have to be before it can use computer operations? I really don't know. This varies a great deal with specific appli- cations. For instance, the study that we did for the high rise office building would have been just as useful if CRS was a 1-man firm. On the other hand, our management information system would be useless to a firm of only 15 or 20 people. It simply would not be neces- sary . . 3. Will computer technology save architects money? I really don't think so. We should be interested in com- puters as a means of improving our capabilities. Our manage- ment information system allows us to run our firm more effi- ciently. This may reduce costly inefficiencies. There may be greater earnings in fees if com- puter technology can expand the scope of professional archi- tecture. But few ways will be found to save labor with a com- puter in a firm that isn't geared to growth. 4. Will computer technology pro- duce more beautiful architec- ture? Perhaps by freeing designers from tedious chores or by pro- viding more precise information which will establish order and discipline. In design, numbers can be as helpful as butter paper and soft pencils. We use numbers to des- cribe many parts of an architectural problem dollars per square feet, (Continued on Page 16) THE FLORIDA ARCHITECT