FEP 43 Page 23 M: Well, that sounds like a typical Republican response. I would like to state on the record [that] I am a registered Republican, and I was then. And I think that probably helped somewhat with the Republicans because they said, well he is one of us. But I've always voted for the candidate that I consider to be the best candidate, and I've never voted a party line. And let me say this too, one of the phone calls my secretary got one day was, somebody called in to complain. They said, Judge McDermott is a Republican, but he's not acting like a Republican. And my response to that was, you're exactly right, I'm acting like a judge. P: Which you're supposed to do. M: That's right, that's my job. P: Were you offended, and I've heard this from just about everybody, they assumed that because Judge Lewis and Judge Clark were Democrats they'd vote for Gore, they assumed since Teresa LePore was for Gore that she would do certain things. It's rather interesting that the public perception of public servants and judges would be that they would vote on the basis of their political affiliation. Is that offensive to you? That's probably the wrong word. M: I've got a pretty thick skin, and I've been called a lot of things over the years, and I've long since learned to just let things go by. Perhaps offensive is not the right word, but my view is that I'm a judge, I'm required to follow the law, even where I myself might disagree with the law. My duty under the law is to follow the law. Everything that we did was under very close scrutiny because, for example at the table when we'd have the meeting of the canvassing board, there was at least one representative of the Republican Party there to observe everything we did, and there was at least one representative of the Democratic Party to observe everything we did. We allowed them to be heard on individual ballots. At first we would discuss, well it looks like this is a vote for Gore. What does the Republican say? Oh, I don't think so Judge. In fact, it got actually funny for awhile because you'd have a ballot that would be creatively mis-marked where we would determine that the voter wanted to vote for Gore and the Republican would object, in fact they even took photographs with a digital camera of any ballot that they weren't happy with. Yet, we would get another ballot that would be just as mis-marked, it's actually the same way, and we'd say, well it's obvious to us that this is a vote for Bush. I'd turn around and say, are there any objections by Republicans? And they'd say, no, no objection. I'd say, are you absolutely sure about that? Because it seems to me two ballots ago we had one where we concluded that the intent of the voter was to vote for Gore and you objected vociferously, and here we are with the same kind of mis-marked ballot 23