1&0 I FA S North Florida Research and Education Center Research Report NF-90-21 September, 1990 Grain Yields of Various Small Grain Blends by J.B. Hartman, R.D. Barnett, and A.R. Soffes Small grain blends are mixtures of different varieties or species of grain in a single planting. Many growers in the Southeast value blends as a dependable source of livestock feed. The advantages of blends over pure stands are yield stability over seasons (i.e. environments), and the superior nutritional value of the resulting mixed grain feed. One six year Canadian study showed that grains grown in combination outperformed their components grown separately by from 4% (Barley/Wheat blend) to 23% (Oats/Barley/Wheat blend).' A recent trip to Europe revealed the widespread practice of growing oat/barley blends. With this in mind we thought it would be interesting to look at the performance of some of our more successful varieties in blends. Florida 303 wheat, Florida 502 oats, Sunland triticale, Venus barley, and Coker 86-19, a hulless oat, were chosen. Single, two, and three component blends of all combinations (excluding any blends of the two oats) were planted on an ep al eed sis at Mqrianna (Nov. 15, 1989) and Quincy, (Dec. 1, 1989) Florida (Tab'le). The 1989/90 growing season wasia particQDly good one for oats, and Florida 502 outperformed all other pure stands and blends. However, in Quincy Florida 303 produced the most grain, and a bleqd of florida 303 and Forida 502 outperformed pure 502. The performance of iVenus over the two location shows the advantages of blends over pure stands. At Marianna a 3244 Ib/A crop was produced, but the Quincy crop was hit hard by helminthosporium and gave the lowest grain yield (1524 Ib/A) for that site. Both two way and three way blends containing Venus were much more stable. The stabilizing affect of blends is well illustrated by the Florida 303/Venus blend. At Marianna where Hessian fly was the primary pest, barley made up 66% of the grain yield of the blend. Conversely at Quincy were helminthosporium was the problem only 19% of the yield by weight was barley. The barley/wheat blend yield for both sites was very stable, and the two location average ranked high(5). This study will continue through the 1990/91 season in the hope of indicating the most stable small grain blends for this area. We will also be examining the chemical composition of the various blends. 'Zavitz, C.A. Ontario. 1927. Agr. Bull. No. 332.