eqsally dcslrablt or beneficial in the Iloilo context. Based upon the raking presented, it would appear that the development of an early maLuring, non-photoperiod sensitive variety with a vigorous ratooning capability would bet serve the needs and conditions of Iloilo farmers. From the farmers' viewpoint however, no one technology can be considered appropriate for all situations. Under current agroclimatic and socio- REFERENCES
economic conditions, it appears that double rice cropping is feasible mainly in the lower landscape positions with heavy clay soils which easily retain moisture. Labor and power constraints also limit the Anderson, J.H. and J.B. Hardaker. 1979. Economic analysis In the
amount of land per form that can be multiple cropped. In order to design of small farmer technology. In EgDmLc adtb._ gn f inall
further increase the productivity of small farms, it is desirable to Earer Technology. A. Valdes, G.M. Scobie and J.L. Dillon (eds.). Iowa
present farmers with a set of alternative technologies which are State University Press.
appropriate for different socioeconomic and agroclimatic situations. Priority should be given to the development of the most flexible Chapman, J.A. 1983. Design and analysis of appropriate technology for
technologies, i.e. those which are appropriate under the greatest number small farmers: Cropping systems research in the Philippines.
of circumstances. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Michigan State University.
Collinson, H.P. 1978. Research and technology planning: A
contribution from social scientists. Himeo. CIMNYT Eastern African Economics Programme.
Component Technology Research Staff. 1979. Cropping pattern
performance in Iloilo test sites. Paper presented at the Annual CSP Workshop. IRRI. Los Banos, Philippines.
International Rice Research Institute. 1978. Annual report for 1977. Los Banos, Philippines.
___ 1979. Annual report for 1978. Los Banos, Philippines.
62Z 623