162 University of California Publications in History Concerning the second point, heated dispute occurred among members of the Cabinet, and between Adams and the French min- ister, whose argument was largely over an incident which greatly offended Adams' dignity. Onis' difficulty from chilblains had lessened sufficiently by Feb- ruary 17 for him to attend the President's last drawing room of the season. There he approached the executive on the subject of the navigation of the rivers along the boundary, and the ownership of the islands. The President was conciliatory, and after some con- versation, according to Onfs' report, The President shook hands, and told me that he would do what I wished, that he could not refuse me anything, having had a personal esteem for me ever since the first day he had dealt with me, he offered to drink a glass of wine with me, and the matter was agreed, not without the great resentment of Mr. Adams, who could not forget the shame of having his ultimatum destroyed in all its points." Monroe's cordial words, if Onis reports them correctly, are remi- niscent of his ingratiating manner toward the French in 1794. That time he incurred the wrath of the Federalists. On this occasion it was the sensitive and precise nature of Adams which was offended. He could not properly condemn his chief, but to Hyde de Neuville he poured out his anger at Onfs. What right, he asked, had Onis to go directly to the executive over the head of the secretary of state, who had full powers to negotiate 1 Eventually Adams got the better of the controversy, for it was agreed that the western bank of the Sabine and the southern banks of the Red and the Arkansas should form the boundary, but that the navigation of the rivers should be free to both countries (Art. 3). The third dispute involved one of the most common misinterpre- tations which historians have made of the treaty. There was no "pur- chase" of the Floridas. The claims discussion, as has been stated, was kept quite separate during the whole course of the negotiations from that on the boundary. Adams always spoke of sacrifices in other sections of the frontier, particularly in Texas and the North- west, as the price of the Floridas, and never mentioned the claims assumption in that connection. Secretary of the Treasury Craw- ford tried to influence Adams to keep the amount stipulated as low as possible. Onis, on the other hand, saw the possibility of mis- interpretation and vehemently objected to the limitation to five