Brooks: Diplomacy and the Borderlands 119 tioned in Zea Bermudez' letter, did not reach Washington until after the signature of the Adams-Onis Treaty." There is no evidence of Russian pressure on Spain concerning the drawing of the boundary line to the Pacific Coast Inasmuch as that question did not reach the stage of specific negotiation until a few months previous to the signing of the treaty, possibly the Russians were not aware of the threat of recognition of the United States' claim to land on that shore. But rumors of the republic's ambitions in that direction had been current in Madrid for some time, and Tatistcheff must have been aware of them. Even though he was, after the possibility of United States extension to the Pa- cific became apparent at Madrid there was not time to report back to St. Petersburg and receive more instructions before the signa- ture of the Adams-Onis Treaty. A consideration of the Russian view toward its ratification must be left for a concluding chapter dealing with that problem. FRNCE zND mHE LOUMIANA FONTIERS That France should be concerned in the affairs of Spain and the United States was natural in view of her recent ownership of Lou- isiana, the dispute over damages by French corsairs in the Napo- leonic Wars, Napoleon's interference in Spain, and the widespread activity of Bonapartist plotters after 1814. French testimony concerning the limits of Louisiana varied in different periods, though in general the Restoration government of France usually avoided backing the claims of the United States. It has been noted that the instructions of Napoleon to General Victor in 1802 tended to support the broadest interpretation of the western limits of Louisiana; but that, outside of vaguely encourag- ing statements made by French officials to Livingston, the inclusion of West Florida in Louisiana was not generally conceded in Paris. Talleyrand, in letters which the Spaniards claimed to have re- ceived from him, contradicted his statements to Livingston by declaring that West Florida was excluded. The Duke of Richelien, foreign minister under Louis XVIII, held the opinion that West Florida was not a part of Louisiana after 1763, inasmuch as at that time both Floridas were ceded to England, and therefore that the region east of the Iberville could not have been included in either the Treaty of San ldefonso or the