CHAPTER II CEVALLOS AND MONROE REOPEN THE DISPUTE, 1815-1816 Arna TH WAR SSUCH A COMPLEX PFOBLEM of territorial sovereignty and such vicissitudes of frontier rivalry as have been outlined many hours of study and conference were to be spent. In- numerable exchanges of notes resulted. Officials of 'Spain, the United States, England, and France went through a procedure which one writer has rather impatiently described as "tiresome reiteration," and as higglingg and splitting of hairs, partaking too much of the child's method of quarrelling."1 Even with the prodigious system of reports in vogue in the Span- ish colonial system, the differences along the North American fron- tier were a bit remote from the grandiose court of Madrid. The wonder may well be, not that so little accurate knowledge was possessed there, but that the negotiations were handled by the Spanish ministers with as much intelligent understanding of the situation as they were. The misfortune is that the men competent in American affairs were frequently not in control. Certainly the two Spaniards who were most prominent in the direction of the affair at Madrid in 1815-1816 had no keen under- standing of the American scene-King Ferdinand VII and his foreign minister, the same Cevallos who had dealt with Monroe and Pinckney years before. Ferdinand, restored to his throne following the expulsion of the French troops from Spain, was doomed to a troubled and inglo- rious reign both because of the controversy over his reetablish- ment, and because of his habit of intrigue behind the backs of his responsible ministers. Shortly before Napoleon's defeat early in 1814, the Emperor and Ferdinand, the latter still captive, nego- tiated a treaty at Valengay which would have provided for the restoration of Ferdinand on condition of the removal from Spain of both the French and the English troops. The Cortes, which had been governing in Ferdinand's absence with the support of English forces, refused to sanction this agreement. But Ferdinand's old- SFor note to elhp. fii, se pp. 69-70. [57]