232 DOCUMENTARY HISTORY OF THE FLORIDA CANAL Mr. BucxxN. I do not attempt to answer why or why not so far as the Board of Bivers and Harbors is concerned. I am only answer- ing that the proponents of the canal requested the postponement at that time. They have not since requested its postponement at any time and they are not requesting a postponement now. But at the time they requested a postponement it was because it was being proc- essed through another department of the Government, and because they were not ready to go before the Board with their presentation. Senator VANDENBEmO. Do you mean the proponents of the canal are now ready to have this considered by the Rivers and Harbors Engineering Board ? Mr. Bucvxx I see no objection in the world. Senator VANmmmDG. I think you ought to notify the Board of Rivers and Harbors Engineers, because they are laying on you all the responsibility for holding up this normal process of a report to Congress. Mr. BCMxxAN. I cannot agree with that interpretation, Senator. Senator FizrCHEi Why should they do that? Senator VANDWMNB o. That is what they did do. Mr. BucKx9. They never told us that. Senator FLra~ m The Board of Review has made a report of the examination of the whole subject to the President. They are acting under another act of Congress. Senator VNDENBERG. Yes; but now the responsibility comes back to the Congress to provide funds in the normal Budget, and we must resume the normal processes, as I see the situation. I guess we cannot get any further on that. Go ahead. Mr. BucxxK. I guess we cannot get any further along that line. The CHarIMA I think I ought to say that it is not an unusual thing for Army engineers, when the local interests have any reason to as for a postponement of action, to make that postponement. I have had that never-to-be-forgotten experience myself. Senator VANDENBERG. Exactly; but it is very unusual for Congress to proceed to make any appropriations in the absence of these reports. Senator FImTCHEm. Not if the project is made a Federal project by Executive order. Senator VANDENBERG. I was asking the chairman for a comment. The CHAIRMAN. The answer is "yes." Senator VANDENBERG. All right. Mr. BUOxMAN. May I resume, Mr. Chairman The CHAIRMAN. Yes. Mr. BucxxAN. The board further recommended the deepening of the canal to 35 feet when the traffic shall justify it. The board fur- ther found that, based upon the economic survey of the special board of survey of the Corps of Engineers, such a sea-level canal would be economically justified, on a 4-percent basis, up to a cost of $160,000,- 000. The CHAMAxN. Now, just a moment. When they recommended deepening the channel to 35 feet, was that the depth of channel which was finally included in the estimate of $142,000,000? Mr. BUCKMAN. No, Senator; 30 feet was the final. Senator FLwTCHE. And to be increased to 35 when the traffic justified it? The CHAIRAN. Yes. I see.