Florida Agricultural Experiment Stations tion of 400 + 400 pounds. The split application of 800 + 800 pounds of fertilizer produced significantly larger total yields and more high quality tobacco than any of the other fertilizer treatments. A reorganization of the data based on time and rate of fer- tilizer application for total yield and high quality is shown in Tables 18 and 19, with each entry based on a total of 24 plots. TABLE 19.-YIELD OF HIGH QUALITY TOBACCO IN POUNDS PER 12 PLOTS* AS AFFECTED BY TIME OF FERTILIZER APPLICATION AND IRRIGATION, AND RATE OF .FERTIILIZER AND IRRIGATION IN 1951. r Average Irriga- Irriga- Irriga- Total Mean Treatment** tion tion tion Yield Yield _None /2 Inch % Inchi per Plot Time of Singlet 38.24 69.03 60.68 167.95 3.50 Application SingleII Application Split 38.70 105.35 78.22 222.27 4.63 Rate of 800 37.81 75.62 60.30 173.73 3.62 Application Ap1,600 39.13 98.76 78.60 216.49 4.51 To convert to yield per acre multiply each entry by 12.75. ** Differences between times and rates of fertilizer application are significant. t All fertilizer applied before transplanting. t One-half of fertilizer applied before transplanting, one-half one month after trans- planting. A breakdown of the analysis for effects of time and rate of fertilizer application for both yield and quality is presented in Table 20. Fertilizer treatments influenced total yield of tobacco inde- pendently of "cultivation" practice. The highly significant re- sponse to fertilizer appears to be associated with both time and rate of application. Fertilizer applications of 400 + 400 and 800 + 800 pounds gave best response with one-half inch irrigation. It is significant that with one-half inch irrigation the 400 + 400-pound ferti- lizer application produced a higher yield than 1,600 pounds applied at one time. The response to fertilizer treatments as measured by total yield and high quality may be interpreted in terms of effects of rate and time of application. Split applications significantly increased the quality of tobacco. However, the interaction of time and irrigation was highly significant. It is evident from Table 18 that the largest response was from one-half inch rate of irrigation. Split applications of fertilizers increased both