Affect of Fertilization and Irrigation on Tobacco the one-half inch rate of irrigation. On the other hand, the high rate of fertilizer application, on the average, did not ap- preciably increase yield of quality tobacco. However, the inter- action of rates of fertilizer application with irrigation, with "variety" and with "cultivation", all were highly significant. Table 13 shows that best response to high rates of fertilizer is manifested with one-half inch irrigation. TABLE 14.-BREAKDOWN OF THE ANALYSIS FOR FERTILIZERS, INTERACTIONS OF FERTILIZER AND IRRIGATION, FERTILIZER AND "VARIETY", AND FERTILIZER AND "CULTIVATION" IN 1950. Degrees Source of Variation of Mean Square Freedom I Yield I Quality I Fertilizers ........-. ...... .... ... ..-..... 3 8.58 3.83 Time of application ..--......-..-- .. ----1 .02 1.09* Rate of application .-...----..--..-.--- 1 6.33** .42 Rate x time of application ........ 1 2.23* 2.32** II Fertilizer x irrigation ................... 6 8.44 Time x irrigation ..---.....--...........- 2 1.23**' Rate x irrigation ............................ 2 2.95** Tinie x rate x irrigation ................ 2 III Fertilizer x "variety" ................ 3 1.85 Rate x "variety" .......................... 1 1.82"* Time x "variety" -.----....---..-------. 1 .00 Rate x time x "variety" ............... 1 .03 IV Fertilizer x "cultivation" ......... 3 3.67 Time x "cultivation" ................... 1 Rate x "cultivation" ................... 1 2.31** Rate x time x "cultivation" ...... 1 1.31* Error (e) ..--......----.....--.......... ........ 72 .34 .22 Significant at .05 Level. ** Significant at .01 Level. The better responses to high rates of fertilizer as measured by quality were obtained when tobacco followed lupine and corn in cropping practices. The differential responses of effects of rate of fertilizer applications under the different levels of irri- gation and cropping practices account for the significant inter- actions. 1951 RESULTS Total yield and high quality yield of tobacco in 1951 were de- termined in the same manner as in 1949-1950. Yield and quality data are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The analysis of variance for yield and quality are presented in Table 15. Irrigation affected both yield and quality signi- ficantly in 1951.