Bulletin 140, Dieback of Citrus Trees indicative of a plentiful to an over-plentiful supply of available nitrogen. Since he was able to produce dieback in trees growing under controlled conditions in the greenhouse by feeding them with stable manure and with cottonseed meal (Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Rep. 1912, p. cii) he has adopted the working hypothesis: First, that the disease is due to the injurious action of some organic chemical compound or compounds obtained from the soil, upon the growing cells in certain of the plant parts; second, that these chemicals do not kill the cells but induce abnormal processes in the living matter whereby a particular type of gum formation results; third, that this gum with the secondary disturbances incident to its formation are the manifestations which character- ize dieback; fourth, that the organic chemical or chemicals are formed by the decomposition of the organic matter, either added to or residual in the soil; and fifth, that they are formed under certain limited conditions which are common to the different locations where dieback occurs. It has been shown by Schreiner and co-workers (U. S. D. A., Bureau of Soils, Buls. 83 and 87) that wheat plants can absorb and make use of certain organic nitrogenous compounds in the absence of sufficient nitrates. Lipman found lack of nitrification and increased ammoniafication in the soil about dieback trees in California. According to Schreiner, these are the conditions that would be favorable to the absorption of the organic compounds from the soil. The writer recognizes the possibility that dieback may be due to the attack of some obscure organism and that the action of the organic material in the soil merely develops a type of growth in the tree that is susceptible to attack. But no such organism has been found thus far that could be considered a causal agent. THE CONTROL OF CITRUS DIEBACK UNDER VARIOUS CONDITIONS In general, there are two methods used in Florida for the control of citrus dieback. They are the preventive and the cura- tive methods. Both are based more upon experience and observa- tion than upon a definite knowledge of the cause of the disease. PREVENTIVE METHODS The use of preventive methods for treatment of dieback re- quires the exercise of judgment and a knowledge of the condi- tions under which the affected trees are growing. In this method the soil conditions under which the disease has developed are