highly aggregated. Moreover, when dealing with questions re- lated to grain/soybean transport via the unregulated barge and truck modes, researchers have typically assumed rates to equal the estimated accounting costs of an "average" load (e.g. Sor- enson, Martin, Michaels et al., and Fuller and Shanmaugham). Only one study in grain transport (Johnson) explored the role of service quality differentials. Empirical research on the transportation of perishables has emanated primarily from three sources: the USDA, Washing- ton State University/University of Hawaii, and the University of Florida. The USDA has conducted several studies. However, they have primarily employed a costing approach which ignores individual shipment and load characteristics (e.g. Klindworth and Brooks and Boles). Of more direct bearing is the work done by a group of researchers at Washington State University and the University of Hawaii. In a series of articles spanning almost 20 years, they have explored the intensity of intermodal competition for perishables (Miklius), carrier and trip characteristics which determine whether exempt loads are acquired (Pederson, Mittle- hammer, and Casavant), and service characteristics which influ- ence the demand for transportation of perishables (Miklius; Miklius, Casavant and Garrod; Miklius and Casavant; and Garrod and Miklius). It is clear from their work that the demand for perishables transport is highly sensitive to service character- istics. Further, the degree and even the direction of this sensitivity vary from commodity to commodity. For example, Miklius, Casavant, and Garrod found that for shippers longer transit times for apples are often desirable, whereas speed is always sought when transporting cherries. The reasons cited by the authors are as follows. Apples are a long-lived fruit with relatively low per unit value. A lengthy transit time may be advantageous as it provides more storage-in-transit. Cherries, on the other hand, are valuable and highly perishable. Slow transit is costly, therefore, both because of high carrying