Crotalaria for Forage TABLE 23.-EFFICIENCY OF PRESERVING THE NUTRIENTS OF CROTALARIAS, BASED ON THE TOTAL WEIGHTS AND COMPOSITION OF THE FORAGE ENSILED AND OF THE SOUND SILAGE REMOVED FROM THE SILOS. Dry Matter Recovery of the Nutrients In Forage In Silage Crude Ether Crude N-free Species Ensiled Removed Protein Extract Fiber Extract Ash pounds pounds percent percent percent percent percent Comparison of Species C. anagyroides 707.6 621.2 75.08 112.70 105.58 72.23 92.12 C. goreensis 669.9 564.2 66.10 110.55 85.71 84.99 92.97 C. grantiana 580.3 466.7 52.36 93.22 104.38 57.76 109.82 C. incana 507.8 436.2 74.90 164.34 88.72 80.91 98.03 C. intermedia 631.5 520.8 73.56 146.23 94.13 69.58 90.18 C. intermedia 637.7 567.3 83.71 97.18 103.31 73.64 99.73 C. lanceolata 604.3 564.0 82.84 127.36 108.93 79.29 122.18 C. lanceolata 710.5 664.3 82.93 98.00 106.67 81.53 87.77 C. spectabilis 544.2 404.4 75.65 111.98 82.49 63.02 80.88 C. straita 627.3 543.9 72.30 137.66 98.33 77.19 98.73 C. usaramoensis 641.2 624.5 85.91 172.96 111.86 82.68 123.23 Stage of Development C intermedia pre-bud 587.5 555.7 84.09 233.22 97.61 91.56 95.33 bud 580.2 452.3 73.84 142.75 84.97 67.11 89.37 bloom 686.4 616.6 84.56 117.01 95.30 82.28 99.76 pod 643.0 583.5 81.87 109.77 100.85 80.03 83.34 Average 624.0 545.7 76.76 131.67 97.91 76.12 97.56 Twenty-Foot Upright Silo C. intermedia bud* 15,106 10,358 62.30 76.95 79.11 58.16 75.26 bud* 13,122 11,195 64.23 115.59 101.41 73.08 110.71 bud* 11,758 9,713 73.94 102.60 93.99 71.91 97.26 Average 13,329 10,422 66.82 98.38 91.50 67.72 94.41 *Average of five fresh forage and five silage samples used in computation. of silos for this crop, and the relative density of the silage at dif- ferent depths. The depth of settled silage was measured in each of the silos when opened. The one-ton silos were measured at least once daily as the silage was removed. The depth of silage in the upright 20-foot silo was measured at five-day intervals. All cal- culations were based on the total weight of silage removed and the number of cubic feet occupied by it. The relative densities of these silages in the one-ton silos and in the upright silo are pre- sented in Tables 24 and 25.