ANIMAL RESPONSE By Marvin Koger Methods The pasture programs studied during the three successive phases of the project were evaluated by grazing with a cow-calf production system supplemented with data from other partici- pating departments. Multiple use was made of the cattle in the project by involving them in a comparison of five mating sys- tems, beginning with a foundation of Brahman-native females typical of Florida cattle in the early 1950's. The mating systems compared were: 1, upgrading to Angus sires; 2, upgrading to Hereford sires; and three 2-breed-of-sire rotations, including 3, Angus and Hereford, 4, Angus and Brahman, and 5, Hereford and Santa Gertrudis. Since two sire breeds were represented in Systems 3, 4, and 5, there were a total of eight mating groups. Cows from each of six of these groups were used to graze each of the pasture programs which were evaluated during Phases 2 and 3 of the project. Two groups were carried on reserve pas- tures and utilized as filler cows to replace animals removed from the experimental pasture programs during the year. Inclusion of animals from different breeding systems on each of the pasture programs proved to be a fortunate design since it turned out that breed groups responded differently to pasture programs. Each year in October all non-pregnant cows were eliminated and replaced with pregnant heifers which had been bred in non- experimental pastures. The number of cows with which a pasture was stocked was a subjective decision based on previous ex- perience. The objective was to maintain enough cattle on the pro- gram to graze off all of the accumulated forage by November 15 to December 1. At this time, the cattle were removed to fields on which silage for winter feed had been grown and continued there until clover was ready for grazing, usually March 1,- 10 days. The silage fed was charged against the program. In evaluating pastures with cows and calves on a system basis, the pastures must be stocked with a nearly constant num- ber of cows, with fluctuations in amount of forage being adjusted by age at which calves are removed and by the amount of supple- mental feed added to the program. The dry matter content of estimated forage and silage utilized was equal approximately to the NRC recommendation for cows and growing calves. It ap- peared that the amount of forage wasted through trampling was