DISCUSSION In this report, measurements of selected biotic and abiotic parameters were conducted on constructed forested wetlands to answer the question, "Do development of constructed forested wetland ecosystems result in measurable successional trajectories?" Field measurements documenting the results of self-organization of constructed wetlands suggest that the developing ecosystems represented by the chronosequence of research sites are quite different in several respects, but that time alone is not responsible for the differences. Successional trajectories with time for only a few individual parameters are apparent, but the successional trajectory of an ecosystem may not be discernible from trajectories of individual components. Successional trajectories may be far more complex than a simple parameter trajectory and may only be observable as changes in emerging properties resulting from interactions among ecosystem components. CHRONOSEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTED FORESTED WETLANDS Canopy Tree Species The self-organization of many aspects of the canopy tree component of constructed forested wetlands on phosphate mined lands is initially more dependent on human intervention than natural processes. Species richness is more a factor of the number of species planted during the construction process than of recruitment of species from natural areas. When comparing species richness of constructed forested wetlands with that of natural wetlands, the number of dominant species are similar. Sharitz and Mitsch (1993) provide a list of dominant species for a variety of bottomland hardwood swamps in the Southeast. Species richness ranged from one dominant species in cypress swamps to three dominant species in several other forest types. When including not only dominant tree species but also major associates, only three research sites match the species richness of natural systems (10-12 species). Davis and others (1991) report species richness in cypress domes, bayheads and hardwood swamps of Florida as 7.2, 6.8 and 13.5, respectively. Species richness in constructed forested wetlands ranged from 2 to 12 species. Davis and others (1991) provides the frequency of occurrence of dominant species in Florida wetlands. Frequency of occurrence in their study was considered as the number of transects on which a species occurred divided by the total number of transects. Figure 7.23a shows the frequency of occurrence of canopy tree species in three types of natural forested wetlands in Florida. Table 7.14 provides the species codes for Figure 7.23. The six dominant species found in constructed forested wetlands were selected for comparison, and their frequencies in natural Florida wetlands are depicted in 7-81