REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS No. 42 The average field coefficients of permeability (Pf) table 10) were averaged for each area and then multiplied by the approximate thickness of the aquifer (1,000 feet) to estimate the coefficient of transmissibility (Te) for each representative area. The data were analyzed for (1) the Davenport-Horse Creek area east of the Lake Wales Ridge; (2) the eastern area, which includes the general area between State Highway 33 and U.S. Highway 27; (3) the northwestern area, which includes the area west of State Highway 33 and north of the Withlacoochee River; (4) the southwestern area, which includes the area west of State Highway 33 and south of the Withlacoochee River; and (5) the Dade City area west of the Withlacoochee River. The results of the computations (expressed to the nearest hundred thousand gpd/ft) are presented in table 11. Computations of ground-water movement into or out of the area used in the water-budget analysis were based on the estimated coefficients of transmissibility shown in table 11. TABLE 11. Estimates of transmissibility T,, Area (gpd/ft) 1. Davenport-Horse Creek 200,000 2. Eastern 300,000 3. Northwestern 500,000 4. Southwestern 600,000 5. Dade City 1,200,000 Barrier boundaries caused variations in the values of T in the vicinity of the Lake Wales Ridge. Observation wells 815-139-2 and 815-140-1 were used to observe the effects of drawdown and recovery caused by pumping well 814-139-5. Water level measure- ments were also made in the pumped well. The data were analyzed by the Theis method (1935), the family of leaky aquifer curves by Cooper (1936), and the Jacob method (1950). The data defined three curves, figure 39, with T values of 680,000 gpd/ft and 1,150,000 gpd/ft, for the observation wells and 120,000 gpd/ft for the pumped well. The wide variation in T probably indicates that the basic assumptions prerequisite for the analysis of the data do not apply and is probably caused by heterogeneity of the aquifer and existence of a barrier boundary. The test site is in a faulted area (see fig. 8, C-C'). Figure 40 shows the location of the wells with respect to sand-filled fractures in the underlying lime- stone along the Lake Wales Ridge. The variation in T values is probably caused by sand-filled fractures which act as barriers