FLORIDA OIL AMD GAS SERVE ESTIMATES


 OIL AVERAGE PWOOUC-
GRAVITY, PORITY, TIVE
 A.P.I. PERCENT ACRES


AVERAGE
GAS-OIL
RATIO,
SCF/STB


GRIGINMAL
OIL IN
PLACE,
ARIRELS


ESTIMATED
RECOVERY
FACTOR,
FRACTION


ORIGINAL
RECOMVER-
ABLE OIL
IN PLACE,
ARRELS


 OIL
PRODUCED
TNOUGN
1-1-90,
BARELS


 REMAINING
 RECOVERABLE
OIL RESERVES
AS OF 1-1-90,
 IAAELS


ORIGINAL
RECOER-
ABLE GAS
IN PLACE,
 NCF


 GAS
PRODUCED
TNIUGM
1-1-90,
 NCF


 REMAINING
 RECOERALE
GAS RESERVES
AS OF 1-1-90,
 NCF


ORTHWUST FLORIDA
Bluff Springs 53 19.6 160.00 550 1,300,440 0.19 247,066 220,111 26,973 135,795 120,791 15,004
INowid 53 12.8 160.00 400 4,967,347 0.10 496,736 121,206 377,530 199,494 48,364 151,130
Jay (FL & AL) 51 14.0 14,414.50 1,277 820,569,505 0.60 492,341,702 395,356,327 96,965,375 628,720,354 505,466,642 1235,251,712
Jay (FL only) 51 14.0 13,021.14 1,277 763,129,63 0.60 457,877,783 365,479,210 92,398,573 564,709,929 466,58,558 117,851,371
Colater Creek 47 12.1 160.00 500 2,000,107 0.15 312,016 6,802 303,214 156,006 537 155,471
Blackjack Crek 48 16.5 5,719.96 954 100,500,000 0.60 60,300,000 54,482,137 5,817,863 57,526,200 51,969,890 5,536,310
Mt. Carel 43 9.1 481.28 1,028 17,500,000 0.29 5,075,000 4,665,696 409,306 5,218,140 4,797,292 420,848
McLlltan 43 9.0 480.00 430 2,915,540 0.14 412,686 174,289 238,397 177,455 74,905 102,550
Swetwater Crok (2) 44 11.0 160.00 1,070 624,000 0.10 62,400 13,695 48,705 66,768 14,655 52,113

Subtotal (3) 20,342.40 893,037,072 524,785,705 425,165,146 99,620,559 648,189,89 523,904,992 124,284,797

SOUTN FLORIDA
Lehigh Park 28 17.7 800.00 100 8,211,707 0.65 5,337,609 5,164,594 173,015 533,761 518,448 15,313
Tmmsend Canal 28 13.7 640.00 0 4,504,699 0.20 900,940 406,117 494,823 0 0 0
est Felds 26 15.0 7,5000. 80 125,802,366 0.35 44,030,828 41,225,828 2,805,000 3,522,466 3,221,145 301,321
NMid-Felds 26 11.9 480.00 10 5,090,419 0.30 1,527,126 1,239,166 287,960 12,726 10,094 2,632
SunoEo Folds 25 15.0 3,840.00 85 28,946,578 0.40 11,578,631 11,528,631 50,000 964,184 951,329 2,855
Corkscrew 26 6.9 480.00 0 1,667,806 0.40 667,122 524,462 142,660 0 0 0
Lake Trafford 26 7.9 160.00 0 7,690,293 0.06 307,612 277,746 29,866 0 0 0
Seminole (2) 25 14.1 480.00 0 2,366,565 0.10 236,657 84,755 151,902 0 0 0
Sumi land 26 15.0 2,080.00 100 37,685,118 0.50 18,842,559 18,444,812 397,747 1,884,256 1,824,628 59,628
Bear Island 26 11.9 2,880.00 80 42,811,959 0.35 14,984,184 10,575,398 4,408,786 1,198,735 836,093 362,642
Pepper Hamock 27 15.3 160.00 0 976,713 0.10 97,671 323 97,348 0 0 0
Baxter Island (2) 22 19.6 160.00 0 1,276,617 0.10 127,662 1,859 125,803 0 0 0
Raccoon Point 23 13.9 2,400.00 120 42,437,790 0.25 10,609,448 4,443,959 6,165,489 1,273,134 530,070 743,064
Forty Mile Bend (2) 21 10.0 320.00 50 1,112,701 0.07 77,889 32,888 45,001 3,894 1,656 2,238

Subtotal 22,380.00 310,581,331 109,325,938 93,950,538 15,375,400 9,413,156 7,923,463 1,489,693

STATEWIDE TOTAL 42,722.40 1,203,618,403 634,111,643 519,115,684 114,995,959 657,602,945 531,828,455 125,774,490

1. Fields are Listed in approximate order from northwest to southeast. UNITS: MCF Thousand Cubic Feet


2. Plugged and abandoned oil fields.
3. Northwest Florida subtotals use Jay (FL only) data.


SCF Standard Cubic Feet
STB Stock Tank Barrels


METHODS USED TO DETERMINE RESERVE ESTIMATES:
Archie's Equation was used to estimate the oil saturation in two feet increments. The formation water resistivities used were 0.018 ohm-meters for the Smack-
over Fi. (northwest Florida) and 0.022 ohm-meters for the Sunni Land FI. (south Florida). Formation temperatures were estimated SST 76 + depth/80 for north-
west Florida and SST a 76 depth/100 for south Florida. SST is subsurface formation temperature in degrees Fahrenheit, and the depth is the distance in feet
below ground surface. The volumetric calculation procedure was used to estimate the reserves for aLL of the oil fields except Sunnitand, Sunoco Felda, and
West FeLda fields. Decline curve analysis was used to estimate the reserves for these three oil fields. This type of analysis will give credible results for
these fields because they are well into the decline part of their production curves. In addition, few porosity Logs were available for these three fields and
resistivity Logs yield anomalous values because the wells were drilled with water.
DISCLAIMER:
An attempt was made to present realistic estimates; however, no guarantee or warranty is expressed or implied. Anyone who uses this information does so at
their own risk.


FIELD (1)