34 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-I3TIH ANNUAL REPORT

rather definitely limited in their vertical distribution, and their careful discrimination should make possible a definite placing of these in their proper geological horizon. The various formations shown by the foraminifera will be discussed in the notes that follow. The location of the wells from which material was used are given in the following list and the accompanying map Shows their distribution in the state. In the systematic portion of this paper references are given to the original descriptions and to published figures with a more complete reference to the distribution in the Coastal Plain area and that of the West Indies., both of which are related to the Florida well material.
 The approximate locations of the wells, and the depths from which the material studied was obtained, are as follows, the numbers corresponding with those on the map. More detailed information about each was given in the previous paper and need not be repeated here. Samples were studied from the entire depth of the well unless otherwise indicated.
 i. Panama City, Washington County, 470 feet.
 2. Bonheur Development Co., near Burns, Wakulla County, 2,153 feet.
 3. Jacksonville, Duval County, 980 feet.
 4. St. Augustine, St. John's County, 16o to 1,051 feet.
 nthonv, Marion County, 50 to 5oo feet.
 6. Eustis, Lake County, 100 to iSo feet.
 7. Bushnell, Sumter County, 380 to 3,080 feet.
 8. Apopka, Orange County, 5o to 390 feet.
 9. Sanford, Seminole County, 95 to 113 feet.
 io. Cocoa, Brevard County, a sample from 190 feet.
 ii. Tiger Bay, Polk County, 30 to 770 feet.
 12. Okeechobee, Okeechobee County, 41 to'500 feet.
 13. Boca Grande, Lee County, one inadequate sample.
 14. Fort Myers, Lee County, 200 to 950 feet.
 iS. Marathon, Monroe County, 2,300 feet.