practice. Shepard Krech (1994, 3) describes this tumultuous process, "Before 1980 most museums were rather stodgy places where little happened but since then they have become hotbeds of controversy and lightning rods for cultural critique." Widespread criticism aimed at cultural institutions exhorted museums to realign their missions away from expired colonialist ideologies and closer to "an ongoing historical, political, moral relationship ..." with the cultures and communities the collections represent (Clifford 1997, 192). Consequently, this new perspective led museums to redefine their collections practices, exhibitions methods, and museum relationships with indigenous communities and other populations represented in their collections. Cultural Representation in Exhibits The transformation of museum theory by New Museology resulted in some new methods for representing cultures through museum exhibition. New Museology proposes that display techniques should be addressed in three distinct areas: 1) Museums should allow each population to decide how to represent themselves in museum exhibitions and displays. 2) Exhibitions on heritage need to increase the level and depth of interpretation on minorities' culture and history. 3) New Museology advises that exhibits should present multiple perspectives in order to reduce biased representations of cultural identity (Stam, 2005). As evidence of this museological catharsis, "neighborhood museums," such as the Smithsonian Anacostia Museum, emerged during the 1970s. Neighborhood museums arose in the U.S. as a manifestation of diverse cultural expression after the Civil Rights movement. These