liberties and military rule, Virgin Islands Islanders have persisted in confronting perceived inequities in their relationship with the United States.11 Only in recent years, however, has attention turned on the need to present to the residents of the islands the full range of political relationships available to them, and to arrange a popular vote among these choices that is, an act of self-determination. The first of these recent efforts to examine the political status issue was embodied in Act 4462 of 1980. It was enacted at a time when active efforts were underway to draft and approve a constitution for the Virgin Islands. Under a 1976 law passed by Congress (PL 94-584), the people of the islands were authorized to formulate their own constitution to replace the 1954 Organic Act. However, the area of federal relations was excluded from the scope of this authority and the final product was subject to Congressional agreement.12 Draft constitutions were submitted for popular approval in referenda held in 1979 and 1981, but failed to gain majority support. In the course of their deliberations, however, both constitutional conventions established federal relations committees to examine outstanding issues and make recommendations for action, even though a federal relations section could not be included in the proposed constitutions. In that way, the issue of the nature of the relationship with the United States was raised and helped influence the decision to form the first Virgin Islands Status Commission. Law 4462 provided a seventeen member Commission with members appointed by the Governor and the Senate President. As a reflection of the recent constitutional convention activity on federal relations issues, both the President of the Fourth Constitutional Convention and the Chairman of its Federal Territorial Relations Committee served as ex officio members. The Commission was chaired by the Chief Judge of the Territorial Court. The tasks of the Commission were to examine the status options available, conduct public hearings and solicit views on them, consult with the federal government on which options were likely to be acceptable to Washington, and then make a final report. In its report, the Commission was to recommend a specific status choice which would then be subject to a "yes no" popular vote. If the vote was favorable, this choice would become the Virgin Islands' official position for the purpose of negotiations with the federal government. There are several aspects of the legislation that should be noted. The first is that significant restrictions were placed on the public's participation in the process. The Commission itself was appointed, not elected. The choice of status would be greatly determined by the Commission as well, as the only popular vote would be to approve or disapprove its recommendation. The federal role would be considerable, since Washington would be consulted regarding what statuses were likely to be acceptable. There was no mention of the principle of self-determination and its implications for the selection of a status. 325