Leucaena as a Protein Source A. J. Oakes and May Ritz Oakes Research Agronomist, USDA (Retired) Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S.V.I. The ubiquitous weedy form of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit is capable of producing 1,000-2,000 kg/ha/yr of good quality protein. Its production capacity responds to elevation, rainfall, and soil type in addition to imposed management practices. The cultivars 'El Salvador' and 'Peru' produce 1,000-4,000 kg/ha/yr under similar treatments. Leu- caena protein is high in nutritional quality. Amino acids are present in well-balanced proportions. Information from tropical and subtropical regions is sparse as to location and ex- tent it is used as human food. Leaves, flowers, fruiting pods and seeds at various stages of maturity are consumed either cooked or uncooked. Various plant parts are eaten separately or as components in salads or soups. Highly proteinaceous foods such as "botok," "toge," and "tempeh lamtoro" are made from leucaena. Leucaena is of limited value as a food source in widely scattered regions of the tropics and sub- tropics. Despite the known detrimental effects of leucaena, its consumption as food probably exceeds that which is recorded in the literature. Leucaena is unsurpassed as a renewable source of high quality protein for food and feed. Keywords: Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit; Protein pro- duction; Protein quality; Food; Feed. Leucaena provides a renewable and sustaining source of protein for both mankind and his livestock. Multifarious uses are made of leucaena which include a source of energy, food, feed, fuel, and biomass. This paper addresses some aspects concerning the pro- tein production potential of leucaena and its use as a protein source both for human food and livestock feed. First, in view of the nature and purpose of this meeting the production of protein by leucaena and its use as food will be considered. At the same time we must not neglect its use in livestock feed. Most of the leu- caena literature concerns the production and utilization of the crop as a source of feed and protein for livestock. Protein Production Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit is the best known and most widespread in distribution of the ten leucaena species recognized by Brewbaker (1978). The so-called ubiquitous, weedy form of L. leucocephala known as the "Hawaiian ecotype" has been evaluated and utilized as a forage crop more extensively than other leucaena species or other lines ofL. leucocephala large- ly because of its widespread distribution and availability. Other lines of L. leucocephala and leucaena species have entered forage evaluation trials in recent decades, however. The Hawaiian ecotype has come to be known as the line by which all others are compared in yield trials. Highly variable protein yields of L. leucocephala are reported from different locations throughout the tropics and subtropics. The Hawaiian ecotype, for example, produced only 454 kg/ha/yr in Australia (Hutton and Bonner, 1960). Yields of 3,136 and 3,584 kg/ha/yr are also reported for this same ecotype when grown in Australia (Anon., 1969; Hills, 1963). The cultivar 'Peru' produced 2,464 and 3,603 kg/ha/yr in Queensland, Australia (Hutton and Bonner, 1960) whereas the cultivar 'El Salvador' pro- duced 1,915 kg/ha/yr (Hutton and Bonner, 1960). The yield of an Australian line, C.P.I. 18228, was 1,479 kg/ha/yr (Hutton and Bonner, 1960). The Hawaiian line ranged from 932 to 4,264 kg/ha/yr in a 58-inch rainfall belt in Colombia (Herrara, 1967). When the Hawaiian line was grown at different elevations in Hawaii, the yields ranged from 550 to 3,233 kg/ha/yr (Gueverra et al., 1975; Takahashi and Ripperton, 1949; Takahashi et al., 1943). When the Hawaiian line and the cultivar 'El Salvador' were grown at 110 m elevation in Hawaii, protein yields were 550 232 and 460 kg/ha/yr respectively (Gueverra et al., 1975). Takahashi and Ripperton (1949) reported three-year yields of the Hawaiian ecotype to be 3,233 kg/ha/yr when grown at a lower elevation. Brewbaker et al., (1972) evaluated the yield potential of 104 leu- caena lines, including the Hawaiian ecotype as the control, in Hawaii. Yields of most lines in these trials exceeded those of the Hawaiian type. Average yield of the top three lines (K8, K29, K67) was 4,838 kg/ha/yr or about threefold that of K63, the Hawaiian ecotype control. Yields of 2,352 to 3,080 kg/ha/yr are reported from other Hawaiian trials involving the Hawaiian ecotype (Takahashi et al., 1943). The Hawaiian ecotype produced 1,904 kg/ha/yr when grown in a 60-inch rainfall belt in Mauritius, and 3,024 kg/ha/yr in In- dia (Savur, 1953). Mendoza et al., (1976) report protein yields of 3,346 to 3,733 kg/ha/yr for the cultivar 'Peru' from the Philippines. A two-year mean yield of 2,511 kg/ha/yr of the Hawaiian line is reported from Taiwan (Luh et al., 1961). Slick and Harris (1971) obtained 672 kg/ha/yr from the Hawaiian line grown in south Texas. Here in the Virgin Islands, the socalled weedy form produced 1,671 kg/ha/yr in one field trial (Oakes and Skov, 1962) and a five-year average of 2,005 kg/ha/yr in a second trial (Oakes and Skov, 1967). These trials were conducted on Fredensborg clay, capable of producing 89,000-90,000 kg/ha/yr of sugarcane. The trials were unfertilized and conducted in a 40-inch rainfall belt. Experimental plantings of eight lines ofL. leucocephala produced 1,477 to 2,856 kg/ha/yr. The cultivars 'El Salvador' and 'Peru', which produced 2,589 and 2,119 kg/ha/yr respectively, were among the four lines which were superior in yield. All yields reported from the Virgin Islands are from cutting trials. In summary, the lowest reported protein yields of the Hawaiian ecotype of L. leucocephala are those from Queensland, Australia and Texas, which are 454 and 672 kg/ha/yr respective- ly. The highest is that of 4,838 kg/ha/yr of top-yielding lines in Hawaii. Other yields from Australia, Colombia, Hawaii, India, Mauritius, Philippines and the Virgin Islands are intermediate between these extremes. All available yield data indicate that the ubiquitous weedy form ofL. leucocephala is capable of producing 1,000-2,000 kg/ha/yr of good quality protein. The cultivar 'Peru' is capable of producing 1,000-4,000 kg/ha/yr, as is the cultivar 'El Salvador.' PROCEEDINGS of the CARIBBEAN FOOD CROPS SOCIETY-VOL. XX