TABLE 1. Development of pesticide labels through IR-4. Project Avocado/Ambush/caterpillars, thrips /Vendex/mites Bean (snap)/Nemacar/nematodes Cassava/Evik/grass weeds Cucurbits/Nemacur/nematodes /Roundup/weeds Eggplant/Ambush/flea beetle, fruit worm, leafminer /Nemacur/nematodes /Pydrin/potato beetle /Roundup/weeds Guava/Roundup/weeds Mango/Ambush/thrips, leafhopper /Bravo/anthracnose /Roundup/weeds /Supracide/scale /Triforine/powdery mildew Okra/Pydrin/stink bug, corn earworm Papaya/Ambush/leafhopper, thrips /Surflan/weeds Pepper/Ambush/beetle, leafminer, weevil Pepper (nonbell)/Benomyl/powdery mildew /Roundup/weeds /Vydate/nematodes, mites Pumpkin/Ambush/squash bug, aphids, borers /Roundup/weeds /Vydate/aphids, nematodes Sugarcane/Lannate/rootstalk borer /Orthene/rootstalk borer Pigeon Pea/Bravo/rust /Caparol/weeds /Paraquat/weeds /Roundup/weeds Sweet potato/Ambush/earworm, weevil Tanier/Evik/weeds /Paraquat/weeds Tomato/Roundup/perennial weeds Watermelon/Ambush/aphids, beetles, borers, leafminers /Roundup/weeds Yam/Evik/weeds /Paraquat/weeds /Roundup/weeds Status data review by ICI need residue data need residue data labelled submitted to EPA submitted to EPA labelled field work in progress labelled submitted to EPA labelled no action field work in progress labelled labelled data review field work in progress data review by ICI data review labelled field work in progress submitted to EPA field work in progress submitted to EPA submitted to EPA waiting for label submitted to EPA data review by Chevron data review by SDS labelled data review by ICI field work in progress residue analysis in progress labelled residues with Chevron submitted to EPA need more data submitted to EPA labelled need more data complete PROCEEDINGS of the CARIBBEAN FOOD CROPS SOCIETY-VOL. XX 1. Requestor (Name/Address/Phone: 2. Chemical Needed (Std Name/Trade Name/Mfg): 3. Site/Commodity: 4. Where needed (Field, Greenhouse, Water, etc.): 5. Parts Consumed-Including By-products (where appropriate): 6. Reason for Need (Pests, etc.): 7. Alternative Treatments (Advantages/Disadvantages): 8. Importance of Proposed Use (Acres, Economics, etc.): 9. Proposed Labeling: Formulation: Dosage Rate (Active Ingredient): Method of Application (Ground, Air, etc.): Directions for Use (Timing, No. Appl., Frequency, etc.) Limitations (Harvest Interval, etc.): Special Safety Precautions (if any): 10. Other Interested States/Agencies: 11. Comments: 12. Submitted by: Name Signature, Date IR-4 Project, Cook College, Rutgers University P.O. Box 231, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 Ph: 201/932-9575 FIGURE 1. Minor Use Pesticide Clearance Request Fonn 218